can you at least be gratefull that George Bush isn't anywhere near extreme as Ann Coulter?
2006-10-21 10:01:13 · 20 answers · asked by gai 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Let's see, hmmm
Ann Coulter or Hillary Klingon
Ann Coulter or Namby Pampelosi
Ann Coulter or John-ette Reno
Yup, the Coulter babe wins three in a row!!!!!
2006-10-21 10:06:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, that argument doesn't follow. George Bush was selected as President by the public, and thus he's responsible for the country's welfare. Ann Coulter is just a social deviant that rattles people up, but if she was ever under any circumstances considered to be worthy of holding the presidency, even she would not act in this manner. There's a difference between being radical to an extremity just to put yourself out there and get attention, and taking real measures to put a country into more danger each and every day.
2006-10-21 17:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by bansri47 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Gee, 'functionary01' by your criteria we should have taken FDR and put him in the same bunker as Adolph Hitler before it got bombed.
AND no one was more instrumental in making nuclear proliferation more evident than a PREVIOUS presidential administration in technological aid it let be stolen or sold to China and No Korea.....
2006-10-21 17:20:06 · answer #3 · answered by R S 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What is your definition of liberal. Mine is someone who thinks only the government can solve your problems with money taken from hard working people. Their allies to help them keep control are the NEA, unions, Lawyers& the ACLU.Are these the people you are asking this question of? Good luck on getting a straght answer..
2006-10-21 17:16:11 · answer #4 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He may be less extreme than Mr./Ms. Coulter, but it's like asking if I want to be shot to death or stabbed to death. I'd still be dead.
2006-10-21 17:24:13 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Isn't he? So far as I am aware, Coulter's extremism hasn't resulted in any wars, or nuclear weapons propagation...
2006-10-21 17:08:34 · answer #6 · answered by functionary01 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A liberal gives a man one of your fish and he eats for one day, a conservative gives the man a fishing pole to catch his own fish, and he eats for a lifetime.
A liberal defines compassion by how many homeless people they can give your tax dollars too. A conservative defines compassion by how many people do not need your tax dollars anymore.
2006-10-21 17:08:31 · answer #7 · answered by Curtis 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
NO! grateful and bush should not be used in the same sentence.
bush is just as stupid as coulter is extreme
2006-10-21 17:04:40 · answer #8 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
"define liberal" hmmm let me see I'll look it up in the library in a copy of the Malleus Maleficarum where they were created...
2006-10-23 11:40:55 · answer #9 · answered by Omphale's folly 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess so... does that mean I should be happy he isn't as bad as Kim Jong Il?
how can anybody have a problem with my answer??? you conservatives need to get a clue... running around putting a thumbs down for every answer that doesn't say something to the effect of "bush is a hero".... morons....
2006-10-21 17:04:28 · answer #10 · answered by Brooks B 3 · 5⤊ 5⤋