are we talking about taking fruits of labour off anyone, or are we talking about giving back fruits of labour to everyone?
only 1% are paid above world average /hr pay [increase of fortune] - they are paid up to a million times world average pay/hr
99% [who work harder] are paid from world average pay/hr to A THOUSANDTH of world avg pay/hr [75% of americans are paid below world avg pay/hr]
225 ppl have as much as 2,500,000,000 ppl - can no one see theft of fruits of labour in this?????
1% get US$70,000,000,000,000 a year [over 90% of world income] - can no one see theft of fruits of labour [& of happiness & life & equal opportunity] in this?????
what is wrong with naturally shared motivation? ie, equal motivation for all? ie, no work, no pay? why have superovermotivation for 1% & superundermotivation for 99% [plus extreme war for all]?
is greed so blinding????
everyone going for all the cake = no cake for anyone [9/11, ww3, nuclear winter, 0 forever for everyone]
2006-10-21 09:53:13 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Economics
no, it's not correct, people just don't behave as yuo would wish them to.
2006-10-24 01:40:33 · answer #1 · answered by MBK 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋