It's been 5 years since 9/11 and since Osama was blamed for the attacks on the world trade center.
The GOP is using Osama in their ads, yet in the 5 years since 9/11, all they have provided are videos of Osama speking, no body, dead or alive.
Bush at one time said he wasn't that concerned about him. Yet they use Osama in their ads.
What is their true message, vote for us or the terrorist win? I think it's just another plot to terrorize the American public using their #1 spoke person, Osama.
2006-10-21 09:27:21 · 21 answers · asked by Sleazy P. Martini 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They are conservative to the point of insanity and fear is all they have. Republicans and terrorists are one and the same.
2006-10-21 09:33:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
My concept is that Bush will pull Bin encumbered out of his a** authentic till now the tremendous Election basically to sway the vote to Republican. that's going to likely be a "See, we stuck him" aspect. Then Bin encumbered is going to inform his aspect and all that which i imagine is what the President extremely would not elect absolutely everyone to understand - and the subsequent President would ought to address it. They use him of their ad to play on the publics worry (emotional terrorism). you could in hardship-free words win elections 2 approaches, say what people elect to hearken to or out of playing on thier fears.
2016-10-16 05:51:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's because without Osama they would all have been thrown out of office LONG ago; after all, they need the constantly-hovering specter of him desperately to bolster their ever-sagging political fortunes!
2006-10-21 10:03:42 · answer #3 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's their mascot. The Bush regime flew Bin Laden's family out of the U.S. after 9/11 without questioning them first.
2006-10-21 09:29:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
They are using quotes from Bin Laden from several years ago. The point that those quotes are completely irrelevant now doesn't even begin to cover it. It is about their attributed fear tactic which they use to garner support.
Look at my question page for the truth.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuMfvN8jKbXqPO7pYQHXXwrsy6IX?qid=20061020153110AAYmkRx
2006-10-21 09:41:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
well... like you said... you would think they might want to actually TRY catching him before they go talking about how others are soft on terror using his image?
it's like if there is a rat in my house, I make no attempt to catch him and then tell everyone it's someone else's fault... even though everyone else is on vacation that lives in the house?
in other words... if you're not trying to catch him... don't fuss at others for not trying to catch him... and the simple fact is... they couldn't do anything to catch him if they wanted too, because they don't have the votes...
2006-10-21 09:37:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Fear is the Bush administrations middle name. I feel as if the Democratic party will also get out of Afganistan. Don't do that we have unfinished business there. Stay in Afgan get out of Iraq.
2006-10-21 09:33:11 · answer #7 · answered by lib/con thing 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm just wondering how they can be using him in their ads, as he is the image of a true republican failure. They've been in power now 5 years since 9-11 and still have not caught him, and I'm just wondering how they can be showing a man that they've failed to capture. Its ridiculous
2006-10-21 09:34:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
because dems think terrorists infiltrating this country dont exist. just another bush plot. Clinton ignored him, and OBL kept planning. the ad highlights the risk we face when a party who cant even define terrorism, is given the chance to try to fight it. The dems are too busy defending the gitmo throatcutters and calling our troops nazis, to know how to defend themselves, God help us if the dems take over.
2006-10-21 09:42:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yippee... over five , you say FIVE years already, and NO new major attacks on American soil by Islamic Terrorists.... that's a Good thing isn't it.... better there's disruption over there than here.
Not too shabby!
2006-10-21 09:50:56 · answer #10 · answered by Omphale's folly 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Don't worry the democrats voted against terrorism and had a plan.... before they voted for terrorism and didn't have a clue....
But they'll have a committee look into it... or something like that...
2006-10-21 09:45:07 · answer #11 · answered by R S 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋