2006-10-21 09:22:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
THAT would be one hell of a fight LOL. But Barkley has more size..yet, Oakley i think is more nasty and foul than BArkley, if thats possible. Oakley in his career was an Enforcer, the Knicks A-number 1 thug in the paint.... BArkley was mean, but not a thug when he played...ild bet on Oak.
2006-10-21 09:26:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably, because Charles Barkley is kinda outta shape, and Charles Oakley is just outta control.
2006-10-21 09:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by Tar Heel 4 Life 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Oakley has stayed in shap, and Barkley has gotten fat, but Barkley could just sit on Oakley and that would be the end of that.
2006-10-21 12:09:25 · answer #3 · answered by ccmonty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i got here upon this little gem interior the interweb. Article date Oct a million 1999: " First Charles Barkley criticized Scottie Pippen this week for desirous to desert the Houston Rockets. Then Pippen fired lower back, calling Barkley "fat" and "egocentric." Does this propose the two stars have reached the factor of no return so some distance as being waiting to play jointly lower back? Veteran forward Eddie Johnson, a unfastened agent who performed with Barkley and Pippen final season, pronounced the plain feud is not any reason for subject. "Deep down, i know for a certainty that those 2 men nevertheless love one yet another," Johnson pronounced. "the two one among them performed their butts off final season. they're merely 2 rather aggressive men who hate to lose. they're pissed off over the way the gang grew to become into eradicated interior the 1st around of the ... " *** there is greater to the object which you would be able to study once you have an interest, yet that would desire to supply you a sense. They have been calling one yet another out in public, and not in mushy words the two. That factors to a minimum of a few point of conflict.
2016-11-24 21:32:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL!! You must be related in someway to Mr. Oakley.
Yes, he could probably win a fight against Charles Barkey. LOL!!
Yes, he was a terrific rebounder.
No, he isn't even close to being Hall of Fame material.
2006-10-21 13:35:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
At first one would say Oakley. But if I were betting I would say Barkley. First of all he has that "Are you f-ing kidding me look" that makes one quiver with fear. Plus he would probably bust out some kung fu moves and finish by ordering a pizza.
2006-10-21 09:56:01 · answer #6 · answered by fzagirl2002 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where? At the country club? That would be a good fight, but I would say Oakley would take the W on that match up.
2006-10-21 09:27:27 · answer #7 · answered by Porterhouse 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Charles Barkley is bad to the bone....
2006-10-21 09:24:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would put my money on Charles Barkley, he's crazy and a dirty player.....
2006-10-21 09:27:37 · answer #9 · answered by The Seeker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably because Barkley is probably more outta shape, but may be able to take hits better.
2006-10-21 09:25:37 · answer #10 · answered by Dan W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋