2006-10-21 06:14:00 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
They'd be discriminated against like other groups.
2006-10-21 06:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well . . . there is no such thing as "more evolved" and "less evolved". If you assume that life on earth originated at the same moment (in a cosmic event, created by God, in a lightning strike in the ancient seas, however you please), then all life on the planet has been evolving for about the same amount of time. Natural selection is conservative, so new traits don't get selected for unless they're useful in the organism's environment. All the organisms on the planet are more or less "just right" for a certain set of environmental conditions.
Summary: There can be no such thing as a less evolved human.
2006-10-21 13:38:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is a great question. Humans and Neandertals co-existed but we don't know if they interacted with each other. If other 'less evolved' humans somehow existed today we would probably try and make sure they didn't die off completely because they would surely be an endangered species. They would have been in competition with humans throughout history for resources and probably subject to being killed at a whim and other cruelties like experimentation. If it was a Neandertal like creature or a Homo erectus, humans possibly could have interbreed with them. One thing for sure, when two groups of humans are in geographic proximity to each other they almost always interbreed.
2006-10-24 14:52:18 · answer #3 · answered by Ken 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many scientists do believe that the human brain has evolved differently in different environments; but for the most part it is so politically risky to talk about it, that you'd never see it in main stream media.
That only means that certain groups show a larger aptitude for certain ways of thinking or physically performing; neither being exclusive to the group, but more inclined.
BUT, it is politically incorrect to talk about, so us common folk can see some differences, but we'll be told there isn't.
Sort of like the Big Pink Elephant sitting in the middle of the room that everyone chooses to ignore and pretend doesn't exist.
2006-10-22 03:54:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are you talking about?
There are already enough less evolved types around. Read some of the questions posted on this site.
2006-10-21 16:48:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Less evolved humans DO exist. A few hours browsing the questions and answers on this site should be enough proof by itself. (and the 'proud white American' is proving my point)
2006-10-21 13:21:59 · answer #6 · answered by megalomaniac 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Less evolved humans exist...You'll find them in the White House, They have lower I.Q, like wars, don't know about basic finances(do not spend more than what you earn),lack logical reasoning, and stay the course taken it doesn't matter if it takes them to a cliff, and don't forget the ones that put them in that big House
2006-10-21 19:45:20 · answer #7 · answered by class4 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
there'd be less competition, less pollution, less global warming, less evil in the world. generally, life would be better if there were less people in the world.
2006-10-22 00:05:45 · answer #8 · answered by nickname 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this a trick question?
.
.
.
.
.
The obvious answer is that George Bush would be a genius.
.
.
.
.
2006-10-21 14:49:38 · answer #9 · answered by Goethe 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
our environment would not be so screwed up and i would not be typing this answer to you right now
2006-10-22 00:16:01 · answer #10 · answered by animallover 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋