Is it really better to be alone than in misery?

Question

thanks alot*

Answer 1

yes it is

Answer 2

Yes and no. Yes, it's sometimes better to be alone if you're miserable, because all you'll do, is bring others down with you. As the saying goes, "misery loves company". No, it's not better to be alone sometimes when you're miserable. I say this because you might need someone to talk to and that could make all the difference in the world.

Answer 3

Take it from a mother of three now single. It is so much better being alone than being in misery. Keep your head up. There is someone for everyone you just got to be patient.

Answer 4

I'd rather be alone than in misery all the time. I could handle being alone a lot better!♥

Answer 5

Alone..Misery loves company

Answer 6

Emotionally, misery, will inflict more of a negative drawback in its state than being alone. Over time, being alone (all the time) will warrant psychological dysfunction; however, misery is definitely something that will wreak havoc mentally much faster; therefore, it is much better to be alone than be miserable. Being alone, one has the mental capacity to bring in clear thinking, whereas, the emotional distraught feeling of being miserable tends to play on that emotional singularly, developing later to something worse.

Answer 7

I don't know but to be a lone and in misery is bad

Answer 8

no cause if your alone than it's no fun but, if your in misery and you say something about it than you will be able to fix it.

Answer 9

yes!! but sometimes being alone is misery

Answer 10

Of the two choices the answer is yes, at least, by being alone is your choice and it can be changed.

Answer 11

Alone is bad company
misery Love's company....