2006-10-20 23:14:54 · 11 answers · asked by Jo 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
If you are apt to believe one over the other, could you give your reasons?
2006-10-20 23:24:08 · update #1
Paul appeared to have had a very successful first marriage which appeared to have been loving and respectful. Do you suppose that Paul's good track record as a marriage partner is why it is hard for most people to believe Heather Mills' claims?
2006-10-20 23:30:18 · update #2
I would never make such a judgement on what I read in magazines or see on television.
I say let the lawyers battle it out.
If he has been abusive he should be reported and charged like anyone else who physically abuses a partner.
2006-10-20 23:48:21 · answer #1 · answered by Yellowstonedogs 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I seriously doubt he abused her. If he was the sort of fellow that did that sort of thing, we would have heard about it long before now. I think Heather is an opportunist.
2006-10-21 01:31:59 · answer #2 · answered by nite_raideress 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is after the money - If there was abuse as she claims why didn't she open up before, afterall we are talking about an educated, know your rights kind of woman.
2006-10-20 23:25:48 · answer #3 · answered by mamamia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paul McCartney was asked if he would ever be tempted to go down on one knee again. he replied "I prefer to call her Heather if you don't mind!"
2006-10-20 23:25:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, she is just a fame hungry money obsessed witch.
and no im not a fan of paul mcartnet, i prefer the stones
2006-10-20 23:21:07 · answer #5 · answered by oldbadmod 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fact that his daughters did not trust her from the beginning speaks volumes.
2006-10-21 02:28:04 · answer #6 · answered by Damien C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, she is probably after more money, he never abused his first wife, they would still be together is she hadn't died.
2006-10-20 23:17:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably some, it's not like a rock star never got abusive before is it.
2006-10-20 23:17:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I dont think there is much basis for it
2006-10-20 23:25:02 · answer #9 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no I think she is a greedy opportunistic b****h. she should be ashamed of herself. i feel for the baby...
2006-10-20 23:17:53 · answer #10 · answered by Lady_Lavinia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋