pls help im doing a survey on how dictators get voted into power by fraudelent means and by lieing to its ppl
2006-10-20 22:56:31 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well, if he can change the constitution some more by winning the congresspeople's vote to change the trem to more than 8 years of terms by blackmailing or bribing them or however he gets them to do what he wants, then he may.
If he doesn't actually change the constitution, he won't be able to full-fill his wish to be a dictator despite his woshes otherwise(quote he made---"it would be a heck of a lot easier if this were a dictatorship, as long as I'm the dictator")..as he can't technically win again.
If he wasn't on the 2008 ballot and still won. the people WOULD notice and maybe revist the massive vote fraud of 2000 and 2004 if he won 2008.
Even if the media didn't cover the vote fraud of 2008 were he wins despite not being on the ballot like they usually don't cover v massive problems with voting machines and tabulators, people would see this on their own. I mean winning despite exit polls AND not being on the ballot AND not being allowed to serve more thasn 8 years would be noticeable even with a media blackout on the story, you know
If he wasn't even on the machine or ballot people might pick up the vote was rigged on their own, but no problem for republicans tto explain just say it's a miralcle and due to "values voters" flocking to the polls to write him in and its more "loaves and fishes votes like when in Columbus suburb (Gahanna) in 2004 one republican princint at a church in the suburbs that had 638 voters but miraculously showed 4258 votes went to Bush (documented Columbus Dispatch and other places)
.Since there's no way to check the machines, we will either be stuck with him again or be in the streets saying'''"hey, duh, I think there was vote fraud as duhhhhhbya won and he wasn't even running so who voted for him? (answer Diebold, ESS and S, and Triad voting machines software)..but the diehards will tell us hey get over it, your guy lost (and our guy won)...
and the news will claim the Christain right all flocked the polls at the last second to vote for the guy who wasn't even on the ballot -- same old story again..
http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2006/2181
But don't worry the Illuminati or whoever is behind Bush and pulls his puppet strings and steals our elections will give us a great replacement if he is gone to continue his scary and horrible legacy of destruction of the world and all we hold dear.
Will it be a dem or a reb...what's the difference, the rich always get theirs. WAKE UP---SHEEPLE!!
2006-10-20 23:38:35 · answer #1 · answered by mindy 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
many of these people assume you believe he's running for office in November, I do not.
No, I think the bush team will be embarrassed by this falls elections. Republicans are tumbling. Democrats are scurrying about hoping to fill in the gaps left by the criminals facing prosecution and shame. But, who among them is any better? That's the problem with a two party system, it's really only one party with two mildly divergent factions.
I won't take sides here as I distrust them all, but as an independent observer i find that the Democrats are just as guilty as the Republicans for allowing the Bush coup.
2006-10-20 23:18:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i do no longer think of the republicans have a great gamble this coming election. the rustic is calling for a great substitute interior the way tha tthings are run and interior the way that we are considered worldwide extensive, and the only ones extremely, extremely attempting to supply that to the folk are the democrats. McCain desires to stay the direction in Iraq, the two Obama and Clinton prefer a various coverage there. McCain additionally would not extremely have the help of the great Republican base. Many on the some distance top extremely do unlike him, and all of us know they gained't vote democrat or for Nader (haha!), so as that they might sit down it out, which provides a extensive benefit to the dems. so some distance as Bush's election is going, i do no longer think of there is a thank you to tutor it grew to become into or wasn't rigged. all of us know of the extensive controversy in Florida and all that, or maybe in spite of the undeniable fact that i in my view think of it grew to become into rigged, i do no longer prefer to concentration on it. i'm greater centred on the certainty that that's his final twelve months in place of work, THANK GOD!!! i'm bowled over that the rustic, and the worldwide for that rely, grew to become into waiting to outlive him, and can basically wish that the wear that he's accomplished isn't thoroughly irreversible.
2016-11-24 20:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by saragosa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Bush isn't running in any elections this November.
2. He is not a dictator. He was voted into office by people with more common sense than you.
3. Maybe you should do a report on drug induced paranoia and the effects of conspiracy theories on willing participants.
2006-10-20 23:12:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
He won't get any votes. He's not running for office in November.
anyway, Bush is not a dictator. He is the legally elected President of the United States of America. Kim Jong ill and Fidel Castro are dictators. You have been drinking too much fool aid. You need to get your facts straight.
2006-10-20 23:03:48 · answer #5 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
you are either an idiot, stupid or a jacka@@
What election is Bush in this year
Now if you know the answer to that..............Why are you asking
If you dint know the answer to that you should read a paper or even listen to the news and learn something
Oh by the way the answer is none so he won't get any votes
So go do your pole and keep blaming Bush for everything and Rep will keep winning elections
THANK YOU
2006-10-21 01:18:49 · answer #6 · answered by danzka2001 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. He is not running. As for the Republicans that are running, I am not sure. Everybody seems to think that Americans are fed up with them, but I have not seen any Democrats or independents step up and show a real interest in winning the election. All I keep hearing is vote anybody other than Republican.
2006-10-20 23:02:36 · answer #7 · answered by DLUVDAIMPERIAL 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Don't even bother voting. THIS is how dictators get into power. They are members of--and backed by--THIS secret and evil group that's been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-10-23 08:22:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should first do some research on how the election process is set up. King George isn't up for re-election in November, and he isn't eligible to run in 2008.
If you want the scoop on voting in general, go here:
http://www.voluntaryist.com
2006-10-20 23:05:05 · answer #9 · answered by Zombie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
King Bush is NOT going to be in the Nov elections(2008)..he will be at the end of his last term!
2006-10-20 23:00:33 · answer #10 · answered by MC 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋