English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

More than ever!

There are many who are being bombarded with outside ideals and theories of how one should be and live (modern day advertising)... When they should turn to themselves and define what is the most important to the irrelevant to pattern a more balanced and stable life.

2006-10-20 22:18:25 · answer #1 · answered by dworld_1999 5 · 0 0

Yes I believe his theories are still relevant in today's world they describe basic social need of growth.

"
1. Physiological (biological needs)Maslow's hierarchy of needs is often depicted as a pyramid consisting of five levels: the four lower levels are grouped together as deficiency needs associated with physiological needs, while the top level is termed growth needs associated with psychological needs. While our deficiency needs must be met, our being needs are continually shaping our behaviour. The basic concept is that the higher needs in this hierarchy only come into focus once all the needs that are lower down in the pyramid are mainly or entirely satisfied. Growth forces create upward movement in the hierarchy, whereas regressive forces push prepotent needs further down the hierarchy"

shown at the site
Diagram of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
5. Actualization
4. Status (esteem)
3. Love/belonging
2. Safety
1. Physiological
-----------
In my opinion you can see that this pyramid still applies to today's society.
The basic needs of safety and belonging/love are very basic and current needs . as we grow we need status achieved though education or work and the last is actualization of the goal we have set for our personal life,

2006-10-21 06:26:51 · answer #2 · answered by Wicked 7 · 0 0

Maslow pyramid is very true till today the man strives to get up the rung of the ladder as in the pyramid and the topmost being the social prestige, the pride

2006-10-21 11:16:22 · answer #3 · answered by fantasyland 3 · 0 0

Yes and no. It is a starting point. But life is full of continuum not distinct categories. Each person is also different. So the limit is the categories. There is an infinite list.

2006-10-21 05:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it is, but if you wanted to argue the point you could perhaps use the example of people with anorexia forgoing food (level one) for perceived social acceptance or self esteem (levels three and two), and people who stay with violent partners forgoing safety (level two) for perceived love and affection, or belonging (level three).

2006-10-21 05:23:42 · answer #5 · answered by noirdenat 3 · 0 0

Not so relevant in western society as most folk have their basic needs met i.e. food and shelter.

2006-10-21 05:19:04 · answer #6 · answered by Jimbobarino 4 · 0 0

Yes, I believe so. ALthough I do feel that it is an oversimplification of things.

2006-10-21 05:19:04 · answer #7 · answered by Jez 5 · 0 0

Maybe

2006-10-21 05:14:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers