What do you think about James Baker holding out on us?
2006-10-20 19:58:27 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mr Cricket... Okay, and about Mr. Baker? Back to my original question.
2006-10-20 20:09:26 · update #1
No, I am not, especially when it is optional.
2006-10-20 20:04:57 · answer #1 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
James Baker is doing Bush a favor so that the Republicans don't lose all hope on the elections. He did work for his dad after all. I am pro-military. The troops need everything they want to get the job done and come home safe. I do not support the reasons for the war. The people who started it should put their eligible family members on the front line and then decide if it is worth it and if Rumsfeld's tactics of having a budgeted war is effective.
2006-10-21 03:08:38 · answer #2 · answered by DLUVDAIMPERIAL 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because James Baker is Pro-Deceit and anti freedom.
At least for the middle class and poor.
2006-10-21 03:38:38 · answer #3 · answered by artistontheedge 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My husband is in the Army and deployed. So.... I never watch the news(too much negative info). Who the F is James Baker?
2006-10-21 03:02:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Possibly, we humans can exist without actually having to fight. But many of us have chosen to fight. For what reason? To protect something? Protect what? Ourselves, the future? If we kill people to protect ourselves and this “future”, then what sort of future is it, and what will it become? There is no future for those who have died, and what about those who did the killing? Is happiness to be found in a future that is grasped in bloodstained hands? Is that the truth? If one kills for vengeance, and that person got killed because of killing, will peace really come from that in the end? Is it weapons that nurtures a war, or is it the heart of an evil man? Our loved ones are dying on the battlefield everyday. How long must we live with this grief?
2006-10-21 03:18:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thinking about the overall accomplishments (I said accomplishments, as if they really accomplished anything!) the war has been a victory for Sunnis, Al-Qaida, and terrorists in general. NOT for the Americans unfortunately.
"Stay the course" sucks and Bush and Rumsfeld will not want to change it, despite them saying they would if the course is not working.
You know Bush and Cheney, they are improvident flip-floppers.
2006-10-21 03:04:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope, but I do believe that there are some things worth going to war for, ie survival and freedom.
2006-10-21 03:13:43 · answer #7 · answered by letitcountry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war is an option.. if you are not aware of the consequences if we were not at war, you are pretty blind and lack the knowledge of what is taking place globally. As well as the intent of what has been taking place for the past 20 years.
2006-10-21 03:03:52 · answer #8 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No way...in hell...Bushy made up all this stuff about terrorism 9/11 blah blah blah...it's all a crock of ****
People need to open their eyes and see why we are really at war...there are no answers...it's all a waste of human life...I hope Bushy can sleep at night thinking of what he has done to this nation with all his lies...
2006-10-21 03:07:30 · answer #9 · answered by caligirl 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
With the Bush administration I would just settle for anti-stupid
2006-10-21 03:05:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
i am pro war 100% the gop made me see the difference between running and fighting and i prefer fighting what xan you expect from an apache indian we dont run we fight till someone is down
2006-10-21 03:21:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋