If there was a gay King and he married a man, would be be King too, or would he be the Prince Consort?
2006-10-20 18:28:28 · 15 answers · asked by Taylor J 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I don't think the public of many countries would deem it acceptable to have a gay King. Perhaps if it was a very liberal and accepting country, they would allow it. If so, he would probably be Prince Consort; King, or King Consort, would make him seem to have as much power as the reigning King.
2006-10-21 11:28:20 · answer #1 · answered by James N 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Firstly men marrying each other is illegal, and so it should be. Sadly in England we now have the 'Blessing' ceremony introduced by the homosexual laden Labour Party but I think that as most people find homosexual practice offensive it would be a very brave king who would do something like that. Besides our Royal family is notorious for it's sexual activity and always with members of the opposite sex so that's at least one good point in their favour, there ain't much else.
2006-10-21 06:57:02 · answer #2 · answered by quatt47 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He'd be the Prince Consort on royal occasions and the Queen Mother in the boudoir...OOO-gaaa!
2006-10-21 01:32:28 · answer #3 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually,even if the King was gay,it wouldn't be socially acceptable for him to marry another man. Their relationship would have to be in private.
2006-10-21 01:33:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it is Prince Consort
2006-10-21 01:31:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
His royal highness the prince of York. If it was england, but not King.
2006-10-21 01:32:38 · answer #6 · answered by harold p 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not King & unless they ruled other kingdoms it couldnt be called Emperor.
Also its highly unlikely that a Royal Family would allow a homosexual to take the throne
2006-10-21 07:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would be forced to marry a female in name only and try and produce at least one heir to prove he was a man worthy of being called King.If not he could or would be disposed of title and crown.
2006-10-21 01:34:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe King and Emperor???
2006-10-21 01:30:28 · answer #9 · answered by RoRo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't that just make them both a couple of Queens?
2006-10-21 01:43:57 · answer #10 · answered by giggitygiggitygiggitygirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋