If women seek equal rights and a man can't force us to have an abortion or keep a baby then shouldn't men have the right to a paper "abortion" in the same time frame a women has. I bet it would cut down on single mothers, the women who get pregnant to "trap" a man. If women knew men would have to be tied to them for 18 years maybe they would think twice before getting pregnant to keep thier man.
2006-10-20 17:39:51 · 7 answers · asked by Tiffany H 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wow to call me ignorant is funny. Lets just check the facts women can get prenant and keep or kill her baby without any input from the father, what if he wants the baby, too bad it is her body. Well men should have same choice. The number of unwanted children should be lowered if women don't hold all the power. Women choose to have sex too, some lie and say they are on the pill. Everyone needs to be more careful with sex but how many women think if I have his baby he won't leave. This would stop that thought pattern. But if a woman can choose to abort a baby the man wants why can't he do the same?
2006-10-20 18:40:05 · update #1
I absolutely agree with you. The father should have just as many rights as the mother. Maybe then "women" (more like little girls) would think twice about what kind of boys they are sleeping with.
2006-10-20 18:01:19 · answer #1 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All I can say to that is that I suppose the daddy of the little one must have a few say in whether or not the little one is to be born or now not. Financial accountability is a entire exclusive discipline and has little to do with the problem of bringing the little one into the arena or now not. I do feel that there are lots of guys which were denied their possess parental rights via now not having a option within the beginning in their possess youngsters, and I could like to peer the legislation difference of their prefer in relation to that. There are many guys who love, and desire to peer their youngsters have a lifestyles, however have little option within the subject. I believe that is fallacious. Once a little one is born, nonetheless, without reference to how the dad or mum feels approximately it, I believe they each maintain identical accountability within the aid and upbringing of that little one. Some explanations that can be observed applicable for non-compulsory abortion might contain such matters as: Rape, Incest, Adolescent being pregnant, as good as well being explanations that can duvet a wide variety of legitimate explanations to terminate. In my opinion... the little one's rights are what must be viewed first and most important right here. But, there are frequently very legitimate explanations why the mummy might make a decision to make the selection to terminate her being pregnant, which might be comprehensible, and for essentially the most side, applicable.
2016-09-01 00:18:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean give men the option of being a sperm donor verses a pay check donor .
Like a guy could say i do not want kids but sex would be great with no commitment .Get women to sign a paper that he is not respocible for any of the results of his actions and has no rights to see the child or be involved at all with any child that may result from his sexual participation with a woman .
2006-10-20 17:51:37 · answer #3 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Whoever made the baby can help support it for 18 years - it's not the rest of the taxpayers that should. I imagine he had fun putting it in.
2006-10-20 18:09:17 · answer #4 · answered by Lake Lover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a very good point. Maybe if the guy signed a paper
before having sex, both party's would have to think seriously
about what they're about to do.
2006-10-20 17:57:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree with abortion.I also think you have made a good point.
2006-10-20 17:49:21 · answer #6 · answered by eva b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My thoughts exactly
2006-10-20 17:48:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋