always be dominant and the other race' traits you mixed with will never show. So, people who call themselves "pure" of the Ayrian race, then shoudn't that mean if they mate with other races that they will continue to have children with the exact genetic blood of their parent race and no traits of the added race will appear. Thus, their children should offspring in the same way and their children and so on. If their children don't produce like this, then that should mean they are offically apart of two races or what people (mis)interpret as "not pure", because they do not have all the traits as their parent' race. That's all. Just wanted to take a look at Americans view of what a "pure" race is.
I'm not saying there is not a human race ( I know there is). So, what do you think about this?
2006-10-20 17:13:23 · 11 answers · asked by Gountha aka Triana 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
I'm just saying for those who claim they are pure, there are not. Even if theoretically, whtie racists people were pure, their behavior and classification of others does not equate intelligence (on a benevolent level).
2006-10-20 17:40:13 · update #1
Well, kefer39, look at who was in charge of the expeditions to America. You're very bored with yourselves to say you feel comfortable with your kind. Why did whites enslave ppl from Africa; why not England? Why do Asians come to America and move in run down areas or mixed inner neighborhoods, if they are comfortable with themselve. knowing the violence? I'm just saying what I've seen.
2006-10-20 18:14:37 · update #2
Ok. for those who have visually and mentally overlooked or didn't read the whole statement, I said I know there is no "pure" race, but there is a race of humans (as in us), if you didn't comprehend my statements that way. What are yall thinking? Your focus for understanding is getting loose. I just made a statement, so don't get offended. If you're intelligent, then you'd already understand that.
2006-10-20 18:20:01 · update #3
There is no "pure" race. There are just humans... nothing pure or impure about a person because of their race.
2006-10-20 17:16:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, genetics, doesn't work that way. There are dominant traits like dark hair, and there are recessive traits, like blond hair and also blue eyes. Others simply coexist, or their traits consist of the influence of more than one type of gene, like skin tone. The children of one pure race person will not have any of their parent's recessive traits unless the other parent also carries the same genetic trait.
Simply put:
We have double of every gene, one from each parent.
Lets use blue eyes & brown eyes as and example, since blue is recessive and brown as dominant. Eggs & sperm are formed by splitting a cell in half, so if a (brown eyed) woman carried the recessive blue trait, then for every 2 eggs she makes, one gets 1 blue gene, while the other gets 1 brown gene.
You can do the "odds" with jelly beans for a visual tool. In 1 bowl (representing a pure race parent) put 4 of one color of jelly beans (let's say blue), in another bowl put 2 brown & 2 blue. Make pairs of jelly beans (representing 4 children) and for each pair use only 1 jelly bean from each bowl. You'll end up with a 2 double blue pairs (children), and 2 pairs of half'n'half (1 blue and 1 brown). Brown is dominant, so there will be 2 children with blue eyes and 2 with brown eyes (that will carry the blue gene to their children). Now try different combinations, brown'n'blue vs. brown'n'blue and all brown vs. all blue and see what you get. Always remember, if one of the child pairs has at least 1 brown, then the eyes are brown. Brown rules!
Sorry, I don't think much of elitists. And, in this day and age, there aren't too many people who aren't hybrids. In-breeding is bad, that is why long, long ago, Tahitians would offer their grown daughters to any stranger that happened across their island in the middle of the ocean. This brought new genetics onto the island and reduced the frequency of recessive genetic diseases.
Glad I'm not just 1 race.
2006-10-20 18:36:44 · answer #2 · answered by J Z 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're Premise that the dominant Traits will always show is false. This is basic genetics. Let's take for example hair color. We will say that the dominant gene for Hair Color is Black and the reccesive Blonde. Having Black hair does not mean that you have two genes for Black it only means that you have at least one single gene of the Dominant Trait. Were a person of a "Pure" trait (one who possessed only dominant traits) to mate with someone who did not have any of the dominant gene the out come would be 100% likely that the offspring would have the dominant charecteristic. But with each succesive generation the likely hood of having a "Pure" offspring is decreased.
Realistically the only way to have a "Pure" race would be to mate with someone who is genetically identical in all aspects but sex.
If this is starting to confuse you, send me an e-mail. It's easier to understand with some simple visual aides.
Not sure if this is what you where trying to ask. But it's what I'm answering.
REPLY:
Sorry the Reply to message link isn't working.
I understand that you mean that The Dominant Genes and Recessive would then mix. Producing an offspring that displayed only dominant charecteristics. But the next generation if they were to mate with another impure (no dominant genes) would only be 25% likely to have a child that displayed the dominant charecteristic.
2006-10-20 18:17:10 · answer #3 · answered by nickedge 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In the south a little ole lady will on occasion twink the nose of a young one.if at the end of the nose there are two little noduals. inside the end of the nose. then that child is part negroe race. if it is one little nodual felt there .There.like little b b s, then the child doesnt have negroe blood in the child.For millions of years tribes of races. kept away any person who was different. that is inheriate in the d n a of humans, it is a natural function of humans to be with there own kind.One day in the future . millions of years from now. most all humans will be Brown.Darn shame too.God made us all different. But humans are crazy creatures, allways haveing to mess with nature.
2006-10-20 17:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Every human is of a pure race.
2006-10-20 17:23:54 · answer #5 · answered by dww32720 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need to call your local University and talk to a Genetics Professor...or..if you have the courage, get your **** back in school and take the classes necessary in order to work up to Genetics..ergo you will need several basic biologies, chemistries, and math to pre-calculus. Oh so physics won't hurt either..then you can take Genetics and learn:THE WHOLE STUPID IDEA OF A PURE RACE DOES NOT EXIST!!!
2006-10-20 17:50:33 · answer #6 · answered by Greanwitch 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually even if 2 theoretically pure people mated, the child could still have recessive gene traits...blond hair and blue eyes...for example.
2006-10-20 17:17:43 · answer #7 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now in this planet,there is not pure race anymore.Now pure race is only a fantasy in some minds,now is only a myth more.
2006-10-20 17:30:26 · answer #8 · answered by cobrasnake 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are only a pure race if you were the first and only human created in existence. There is no such thing.
2006-10-20 17:21:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A pure race would not breed with any other race as it would then be mixed.
Its commonly attributed to racists
2006-10-21 00:32:39 · answer #10 · answered by Mike J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋