2006-10-20 15:49:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
yes
2006-10-20 15:57:04 · answer #1 · answered by MK6 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, but a bush in the hand is worth 2 on the bird
2006-10-20 22:52:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The odds of catching your bird is much better if it is in your hand. Have you watched the new game show "Deal or no Deal"? It drives me crazy watching those idiots get offers of like $150,000 but they imagine the box they chose is 1 million so they keep on chancing it. Some of those idiots end up with like $50.00. I definitely say...take what's in your hand! Why do you think Vegas is so popular and raking in so much money? Greed..."if there is a chance for two birds...someone please take the one in my hand!"
2006-10-20 22:59:28 · answer #3 · answered by yakimablueyes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but it's true that a bird {in} the hand is better than two in the bush.
This means that it is better to be holding one thing in your hand than two go searching for more that you may not get.
2006-10-20 22:52:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
THAT IS A BIRD IN THE HAND IS BETTER THAN TWO IN THE BUSH.
THEN
YES LITTLE CRICKET.
THAT IS TRUE.
2006-10-20 22:58:32 · answer #5 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it true, because you already have the one in the hand, the two in the (BUSH) always gets away.
2006-10-20 22:52:47 · answer #6 · answered by I am women 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Birds are delicate animals...But a bird of prey could chomp your finger off.....Be nice....and don't cut down the bush until you'vve tried living in it.
2006-10-20 22:55:33 · answer #7 · answered by 35 YEARS OF INTUITION 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no..birds should be free. Let them fly and be free.
2006-10-20 22:57:41 · answer #8 · answered by Conniebug 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋