Was it being a reporter in the Middle East in the first place, or trusting a Muslim Arab?
2006-10-20 12:38:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
John S: That's right. He befriended a Muslim Arab-- because they act like they are really nice and your friend, while they are plotting your kidnap and execution.....
Bin Laden is the only terrorist to you?
Not his hundreds of thousands of supporters and countless different terrorists who execute civilians?
Yah. Ok. It's time to take your meds. Good night.
2006-10-20 12:57:43 · update #1
John: OH my. I just reread your statement. Being a journalist at all hah?
I'm so sure the risk of being kidnapped tortured and executed for being a journalist is just as common in the West.
Not just in the Middle East....
My, my.
2006-10-20 13:01:11 · update #2
John S:
Did you give Jamil Ahmad a thumbs down? If it was you, or anyone else, why?
The truth hurt that bad?
2006-10-20 13:30:18 · update #3
FIRST I WOULD SAY NOT STAYING HOME AND THEN I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU HE OR ANYONE ELSE SHOULD NOT TRUST ANY ARAB OR MUSLUM
2006-10-20 12:51:26 · answer #1 · answered by roy40372 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Being a reporter at all, not just one in the middle east. Remember the russian journalist? It's one of the most dangerous professions out there...
Poor guy...
Trusting a Muslim Arab?!? You are one of the worst racists I have ever seen... God, I would trust pretty much any Muslim arab besides Bin Laden before I would trust you...
Yes not just in the west, or does Europe not count as the west to you? In the Russian federation, 42 Journalists have been murdered since Vladimir Putin came to power...
2006-10-20 19:43:15 · answer #2 · answered by John S 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If reporters don't fulfill their obligation, if they don't take risks, then we're ALL left blind, deaf, and dumb...in ignorance of what's happening in our world.
And ignorance will kill us ALL.
Haven't we seen enough of that, in the last six years alone?
And it's no mistake to trust a Muslim Arab. If he's a good man...
2006-10-20 19:47:02 · answer #3 · answered by St. Hell 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why was Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl abducted, tortured, then murdered? Let's quote one of the killers, Fahad Naseem: Pearl was "anti-Islam and a Jew."
2006-10-20 19:42:10 · answer #4 · answered by Jamil Ahmad G 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Becuz he didn't accept zee great WikiFuehrer Jimbo Wales...
Heil Jimbo Wales!
2006-10-21 13:22:25 · answer #5 · answered by Bobby... 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably being in the wrong place at the wrong time with animals who have no respect for life but their own.
2006-10-20 19:46:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
All of those reporters are too close to the action.Sad thing is, none of the other reporters learned a lesson in this.,,
2006-10-20 19:45:33 · answer #7 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was a brave and respected reporter.
His biggest maistake was being in a risky area where people hate Jews.
2006-10-20 19:42:17 · answer #8 · answered by Villain 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Trusting his "fixer"! I'm not sure if he was an Arab or not.
2006-10-20 19:43:55 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being there.
2006-10-20 19:45:06 · answer #10 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋