If the clock stops ticking, (not clicking) it has to be repaired.... time never stops because, before clocks were invented there were other means to calculate time.
2006-10-20 11:52:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sure 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
A clock is not time. It is merely a manmade construct to place artificial limits on time. Therefore a stopped clock places no restriction on time itself, though it may make you late for work...lol
2006-10-20 20:53:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by ilovealandofcontrasts 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Time is a measure of the change of the universe.
If the clock stops ticking... all right, we can no longer measure the change, but the change still occurs.
2006-10-20 21:14:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You would find yourself in the present where everything happens at once. Actually, you've always been there, but clocks trick you into thinking that there is time.
2006-10-20 18:58:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by beast 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
if the clock stopped buy a new clock
if time stopped nothing would change.
time is the measurement of ongoing change. without change there would be no time. with change there must be time
2006-10-20 19:33:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by childhoodtrauma 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nothing - time existed before clocks and will continue long after clocks
2006-10-20 18:56:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by UK Fan 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Time keeps marching on, with or without a clock to remind us.
2006-10-20 18:53:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by nido_tr3s 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Brystal is right there is no such thing as time. Time is relative and we created it so we can expalin and measure speed, velocity and acceleration.
Anyway, what clock are you talking about? yours? mine? the atomic clock?
If it happens it would just be technical malfunction
2006-10-20 19:06:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by javn 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just think about how time is reckoned. It ain't with a clock.
2006-10-20 23:00:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing, time is an apriori concept that we project onto the world in order to make sense from it, likewise space. Measurements were made to quanify it afterwards. See Kant.
2006-10-20 18:48:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by caitrionaoleary 2
·
0⤊
1⤋