2006-10-20 11:26:24 · 15 answers · asked by NONAME 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They never said that, they don't think that, and even if they were running for re-election (which they're not) I doubt your senseless garbage would change the mind of a single voter.
What is it, that makes you feel justified in spreading lies? Is it a lust for political power, hatred of all who disagree with you, or some kind of twisted, childish joy at the thought of upsetting people?
You stand against decency but for nothing. In the end you will achieve nothing. One day you will pass from this Earth, a bitter and forgotten wretched excuse for a human. Your alias of noname is perfect: You are nothing, a nobody, a generic drone, and a useful idiot too easily manipulated by the elitist Liberals who now control the Democratic party.
2006-10-20 11:46:08 · answer #1 · answered by Jay S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can't recall the administration position of poor children being expendable garbage that don't deserve health care. If kids are in need of health care, there are plenty of places for the parents or parent to take them. As far as the administrations position or caring about all children, I think they have done as much as any other administration. The no child left behind act comes to mind. And if you want to look at the republican party as a whole on the subject, I think they do fairly well. Florida has some great programs for free health care for children, and Jeb Bushes use of the FCAT program to grade schools is working really well and actually gets results (improvements in education).
So, it seems like this question and the five or six other questions you have posed here are really just a bunch of verbal diarrhea, spewed from the lips of yet another whiny, uneducated liberal hate monger.
2006-10-20 12:24:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I study at bloomberg that they may well be increasing the cigarette tax from 39 cents a p.c.. to a dollar. that is unhappy by way of fact there are extremely some families obtainable that yeah they make adequate, yet its in basic terms adequate to pay the expenses, inner maximum coverage by employment continues to be very high priced no longer in basic terms which you nevertheless might desire to pay co-pays. its humorous how he says that he does not choose to bypass the bill by way of fact he does not choose to have families provide up their extra ideal coverage. I in simple terms wish he might let us know why he incredibly no and not provide us that bs. I heard approximately 4 states would be suing the bush administration, we can see what happens. And as for some peoples comments approximately being tiered of helping out the underprivileged, your no longer buying it except you smoke. And no, those each and every physique isn't lazy their earnings proves they are not lazy its in simple terms high priced and each so often human beings in simple terms might desire to have a roof over their heads. In some states the cost of living is so extreme it does not actually matter variety in case you in basic terms have 2 little ones and you're making 52k a year you nevertheless might desire to pay lease of 1400 money, and that's low priced lease. what human beings might desire to evaluate is the cost of living no longer in basic terms observing the earnings
2016-10-15 06:01:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't think that. Quit being so ignorant. There are free health care clinics. As a matter of fact, my adopted little sister went to a FREE outpatient drug treatment center in the Haight-Ashbury section of San Francisco.
Of course children deserve health care. Everyone does. BUT if "free" health care is given to everyone, our taxes will skyrocket. Thank you, my husband and I have enough trouble making ends meet as it is.
2006-10-20 11:30:52 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
NO.
Poor American children deserve health care as much as rich American children--then again, Iraqi citizens deserve life as much as American citizens, but Bush didn't consider that, now did he?
2006-10-20 11:34:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As if they said that or thought that. and if you actually think that the dems will care anymore than you are fool. In fact that comment sound more like a demorcat way of thinking
2006-10-20 11:37:59 · answer #6 · answered by dreson k 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
All poor children deserve the right medical care as if they were rich children
God ! THESE CHILDREN ARE ALSO HUMAN !
2006-10-20 11:48:42 · answer #7 · answered by curious 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. poor AMERICAN children should have health care. if they or their parents got here illegally, though then yes they should be deprived of taxpayer supports.
2006-10-20 11:32:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'd like to read that one, too. Seems you're saying they've said it, but I've never heard it.
2006-10-20 12:03:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In this case, I wish they did feel that way, and I would support them 2000049586756%
When we have working poor unable to afford insurance why should lazy drug addicts and loafers get it free.
2006-10-20 11:28:13 · answer #10 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋