Or has it always been that way?
2006-10-20 05:42:45 · 11 answers · asked by wlday2002 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If Foley had been a Democrat, there would be no coverup. They would be defending his sexual orientation.
2006-10-20 05:51:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's always been that way. For those who would say "that's what the democrats do" it wasn't democrats covering for Foley...it was republicans...during an election year...why can't people just accept it??? Foley was a bad man but he could have easily had been a democrat...but it isn't the fact that Foley was a bad man that upsets me the most. It's the fact that he was KNOWN to be a bad man and because it was an election year people kept their mouths shut and allowed him to CONTINUE to be a bad man...This isn't old news, folks...It isn't.
And I also find it strange that republicans are trying all that they can to push this under a rug and forget about it like it's no big deal when Clinton's ordeal was drug through the mud for years! I mean, Clinton performed a wrong act but it was HETEROSEXUAL act...I thought republicans were against HOMOSEXUALITY? Oh wait. Only if the homosexual is democrat, right? I forgot. Forgive me.
2006-10-20 12:57:15 · answer #2 · answered by just me 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IF THE REPUBLICANS HONORED THESE PEDOPHILES AS THE DEMOCRATS DO, IT WOULD BE NEWS. COVER-UPS? NEVER. Pelosi voted three times to make a convicted page sexual predator,
former Congressman Gerry Studds (D-Mass.), chair of a congressional committee.
In 1990, Pelosi voted against censuring Barney Frank for having his live-in boyfriend
run a prostitution ring from Frank's apartment.
Pelosi raised no objections when Clinton pardoned Democrat Congressman Mel Reynolds (Ill.)
who had been convicted of felonies for having had sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker.
The historic Nancy Pelosi is an authentic representative of San Francisco liberal values and hardly
has the record to lecture anyone on cleaning up the Congress.
2006-10-20 12:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You keep repeating the same old tired questions, can't you come up with a new schtick already? Try the sugar-free Kool Aid, maybe that way the voices in your head will quiet down.
2006-10-20 13:31:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe it was 1949, and it's worked rather well for us. if Libs ever get as good at covering up killing young women, they'll probably win a few elections too. LOL
2006-10-20 12:53:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
covering up what? first you want no domestic spying, now you want them to read everyone's e-mail. make up your flip flopping liberal mind!
by the way, supporting pedophilia is a democrat thing, via the A.C.L.U. fighting for the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)'s right to rape children.
2006-10-20 12:48:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Old news.
But hundreds of Democrat men have called Foley and begged him to ask them out for a date.
2006-10-20 12:46:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Never and it still isnt. We did not know of Foleys crap. The covering up of something has always and always will be a democrat thing.
2006-10-20 12:44:52 · answer #8 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
We're trying to learn from the Democrats. They have so much to teach in the cover-up area.
2006-10-20 12:45:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Do as I say, not as I do, has always been the polical custom.
2006-10-20 12:48:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋