They are not evil, just different forms of our government. On the broad range of the entire political spectrum that makes up all governments of the world, past and present, Democrat and Republican are actually very similar. Its the individuals that represent these parties that can sour their names. However, I do agree with you that all this name calling and partisain bickering such as "culture of corruption" and the like brings us no were and hinders the political process. Very good question.
2006-10-20 05:33:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The democraps and repukelicans are mirror images of each other. To put it in a funny, but offensive way: democraps will offer lube before reaming you.....and most will give a reacharound. Repukelicans, however, prefer a "dry" ream, and will take your money after reaming you. Both parties have unclean hands and are used as a distraction from the reality that the USG has its own agenda, and only the rich, elite and influential are included. Good and evil are relative terms, which can be substituted for each other, depending on your point of view. A dual party system is flawed, as it boils down to the choice of "the lesser of two evils", when in fact, it is no choice at all.
2006-10-20 12:30:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Damien104 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Not necesseraly, when a list is provided by an outside entity it is quickly dismissed. Example, if Iran provided America with a laundry list of our wrong doings, would we heed to them or dismiss them. No lesser of two evils here in reality, it is all personal gain from both parties. I do not see why Republicans feel they are Sin free, and Democrats feel they are untouchable.
2006-10-20 12:33:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sleazy P. Martini 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
you learn that the democrats saying they are going to challenge the republicans on the basis of a culture of corruption is a steaming pile. but we know how the dem/libs operate. everything they do doesnt count. they live in some fantasy world and believe everything they say. just like this morning that journalist person stating today that bush stumped for an adulterer. holy vaca, but it was ok to have the president of the united states to be a serial adulterer? what the hell is wrong with them?
it is mind numbing what idiots the libs are and even worse, the pathetic people who believe their tripe...
2006-10-20 12:49:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by afterflakes 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I find that republicans are desperate by dredging up ancient history and portraying it as if it happened yesterday and that Dem's long since retired where currently in the congress. The public much to the repubs chagrin aren't buying they did it to defense. That sort of excuse is for the playground not adults.
2006-10-20 12:40:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by brian L 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That Democrats are hypocrites for insinuating the Republicans have a culture of corruption.
Just like they are hypocrites for crying that Diebold "rigged" the 2004 elections when over 128,000 dead voters cast their ballot for the Democrats throughout the country.
The Democrats cry foul when they think the Republicans are guilty of doing the same thing the Democrats have institutionalized into their culture.
They are both equally corrupt! One is not better than the other as far as corruption is concerned.
2006-10-20 12:35:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Top 10 Democrat Scandals
Here is some more great Democrat leadership.
Top 10 Democratic Sex Scandals in Congress
10. Sen. Daniel Inouye. The 82-year-old Hawaii Democrat was accused in the 1990s by numerous women of sexual harassment. Democrats cast doubt on the allegations and the Senate Ethics Committee dropped its investigation.
9. Former Rep. Gus Savage. The Illinois Democrat was accused of fondling a Peace Corps volunteer in 1989 while on a trip to Africa. The House Ethics Committee decided against disciplinary action in 1990.
8. Rep. Barney Frank. The outspoken Massachusetts Democrat hired a male prostitute who ran a prostitution service from Frank’s residence in the 1980s. Only two Democrats in the House of Representatives voted to censure him in 1990.
7. Former Sen. Brock Adams. The late Washington Democrat was forced to stop campaigning after numerous accusations of drugging, assault and rape, the first surfacing in 1988.
6. Former Rep. Fred Richmond. This New York Democrat was arrested in 1978 for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old. He remained in Congress and won re-election—before eventually resigning in 1982 after pleading guilty to tax evasion and drug possession.
5. Former Rep. John Young. The late Texas Democrat increased the salary of a staffer after she gave in to his sexual advances. The congressman won re-election in 1976 but lost two years later.
4. Former Rep. Wayne Hays. The late Ohio Democrat hired an unqualified secretary reportedly for sexual acts. Although he resigned from Congress, the Democratic House leadership stalled in removing him from the Administration Committee in 1976.
3. Former Rep. Gerry Studds. He was censured for sexual relationship with underage male page in 1983. Massachusetts voters returned him to office for six more terms.Studds (Don't you find the name ironic?) had AIDS, though. Now the kid is infected, too. Amazing! Here's a few others I found out about.
2. Former Rep. Mel Reynolds. The Illinois Democrat was convicted of 12 counts of sexual assault with a 16-year-old. President Bill Clinton pardoned him before leaving office.
1. Sen. Teddy Kennedy. The liberal Massachusetts senator testified in defense of nephew accused of rape, invoking his family history to win over the jury in 1991
2006-10-20 12:35:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You learn that there is no "Republican culture of corruption" there is a "political culture of corruption". We also learn that the Dems like to throw rocks in a glass house, but of course, that's true of everyone.
2006-10-20 12:31:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Is ancient history Reids 1.5 million dollar profit on land he did not own ancient history. You certainly back up the questioners point; both side toss out accusations of corruption when both sides have corrupt members. Your attempt to defend them highlights the hypocrisy.
2006-10-20 12:47:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
if you see politicians as evil, so be it, but red or blue, donkey or elephant, politicians are politicians. fight over who is worse all you want. i will give links to articles that list Dem scandals only when the asker implies that Dem's are above reproach simply because every outlet of the liberal media is, and has been, on a republican which hunt .
2006-10-20 12:33:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋