In writing a formal complaint letter to one of our corporate stores, my manager ended the letter with,
"I would appreciate it if this is something that is addressed as a serious concern."
I told him this doesn't sound right, and when he asked me why, I couldn't explain, I told him it just doesn't.
I'd also really appreciate explanations as to how this works grammatically.
2006-10-20
04:34:15
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Education & Reference
➔ Words & Wordplay
okay good, so judging from the responses, im not the crazy one, he is.
to me, if your going to say,
"i would appreciate it if..."
then you have to end it with a solid desired goal.
"this matter is dealt with as soon as possible"
i cant really explain why, but it has to be SHORT and to the POINT
2006-10-20
04:50:52 ·
update #1
"I would appreciate your treating this as a serious matter".
That is more concisely phrased yet says basically the same thing.
Grammatically there was nothing wrong with the original sentence but it was too wordy....."this is something that is" is not the best way to describe anything!
Whenever possible use fewer words rather than more. It shows efficiency and is easier for the recipient to wade through!
Well done to you though for being astute enough to recognize that your boss's letter needed some editing.
I hope he appreciates "that you are someone who needs to be thought of as a useful employee" (as he would say) or "you are a useful employee" as he ought to say! lol
2006-10-20 04:42:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by JaneB 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd address the grammatical breaches (not major by any stretch) but I'm overly tired at 2:30 am - so I'll try and rephrase for you.
"I would appreciate it if this matter were treated as a serious concern"
or better yet..
"I would greatly appreciate it, were this matter be given serious consideration"
Hope this helps :)
2006-10-20 04:42:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You need to be more specific with the details of the letter. If he is writing a formal complaint to the corporate office, he should be contacting his district of regional supervisor to advise them of the report, as they will be contacted and might not be to appreciative of being in the dark, when they are questioned concerning the letter.
2006-10-20 04:41:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by handyman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's the tense of the word "would" disagreeing with "is" that doesn't sound right. And also, it just doesn't sound very formal.
Perhaps an ending more like, "I appreciate your attention to this serious concern," would sound better.
2006-10-20 04:41:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by smartee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
truly, this is that we are ultimately "pushing decrease back," because it were. for hundreds of years in the West, all we've ever heard is the Christian area of the tale. From the early Catholic church, to the Protestant Reformation, to the Puritans, to those "God" billboards many years decrease back, non-Christians (no longer in basic terms atheists) were inundated with the message, "there is in difficulty-free words one god and its the Christian one." Christianity has been the using rigidity in this united states, a lot so as that in some states, in difficulty-free words Christians (or a minimum of theists) can run for workplace. some elements received't enable atheists sit down on juries because they received't swear on a bible (an act it is outwardly un-biblical, by technique of ways). There are even some those who believe atheists can't be seen voters. some communities have even tried to operate to the structure the idea that it is formally a Christian united states. Others, the idea that in difficulty-free words the Christian theory of marriage be allowed. nevertheless others, for the period of U.S. historic previous have compelled organizations to be closed on the Christian sabbath. In some elements, merchants are nevertheless prohibited from promoting particular products on Sunday because it offends Christian sensibilities. Christians were well-known to bother atheist military contributors. in the army, at the same time as out to work out, atheists are compelled to participate in nightly prayers, led by technique of a Christian chaplain. If I, as an atheist in the army opt to communicate about emotional subject matters, the in difficulty-free words man or woman i visit communicate over with is a Christian chaplain. So, please comprehend that when I come to this website, or flow to different forums and say such issues as "there is no god," or, "it is conceivable to stay an finished, effective, moral life without Christianity," this is no longer a lot that i'm attempting to expose you into an atheist, this is that I"m attempting to cajole *you* to end attempting to cajole me to change right into a Christian.
2016-12-05 01:09:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sounds "choppy." I think it is grammatically correct but people just don't talk like that. I'd say "Thank you in advance for your attention to this serious matter" or similar.
2006-10-20 04:42:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by dcgirl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know the rules, but I would have written:
"I would appreciate it if you addressed this matter as a serious concern."
2006-10-20 04:42:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by DanE 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, he's asking the reader to address a serious concern; but, it looks like he’s tripping over himself to be polite. How about something more direct like:
“I appreciate your immediate attention to this serious concern (or issue, matter, subject, problem, challenge, crisis, dilemma).”
“Your immediate attention to this serious issue is (would be) appreciated.”
2006-10-20 05:17:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Celt 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the words "this" and "something" are redundant. It would sound better as follows:
"I would appreciate it if this be addressed as a serious concern."
-MM
2006-10-20 04:56:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a little bit clumsy, but it is grammatically correct.
2006-10-20 04:42:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by jinenglish68 5
·
0⤊
0⤋