English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If u were to compare the players of Chelsea and Manchester whose would be better ? Drogba or Saha , Rooney or Shevchenko, Ronaldo or Robben, Essien or Carrick, Makelele or O Shea, Scholes or Lampard, Giggs or J Cole, Terry or Ferdinand, Vidic or Carvalho, Heinze or A Cole.Who will be better ?

2006-10-20 03:53:43 · 15 answers · asked by wizkid 3 in Sports Football English Football

15 answers

Can't believe im going to say this but i think chelsea has got better players compared to Manchester United.

2006-10-20 15:36:53 · answer #1 · answered by truth hurts. 3 · 0 0

drogba vs saha
Both are going to be extremely important players over the next 10 weeks (which will shape the fortunes of chelsea and man ud) and the most likely players at their respective clubs to accumlate the most amount of goals (and more importantly winning goals.

Didier Drogba

He's quick, strong, extremely good in the air, able to hold the ball up and has developed a real marksman's touch in front of goal.

Louis Saha

Saha's strengths are his lighting pace and tight control. Saha has skill and is lethal in the air, turns sharply and is difficult for defences to contains

scholes vs lampard:
scholes has better technique definitely, equal to lampard when it comes to physical strenght

Rooney vs shevchenko:
both have potential to be the best

Ronaldo or Robben:
Ronaldo's problem is his lack of a final ball. Robben is better but Ronaldo is a good player to. Robben goes straight on goal, Ronaldo does 24 tricks before he gets to the goal.

Essein vs Carrick:
I think Carrick is somehow better than Essein

And Makalele is the same level at O Shea Both are very good..

Ryan Giggs vs joe cole:
personaly i think ryan giggs is better than joe cole..Joe cole is
wonderful talent player but Ryan Giggs is still better\

Terry or Ferdinand,
Ferdinand was the best defender in the world during the past years but now that he went back and forgot his true performance..John terry is the better defender

Heinze vs Ashley cole:
heinze, he's like a proper hard tackler and way better than Ashley Cole..He is available 100% and all the tiime..You can see that all the attacks on chelsea is coming from Ashley Cole's side

So if we some up the answers i would say that Both Teams has perfect players..Maybe Manchester united has much talented players...But both are good..i prefer Manchester United..Because Manchester united Has Alot of talented young players..On the otherhand chelsea is turning out to be like Real Madrid they have alot of BIG stars..And i think in a few years they wont be able to play together..somehow like BRAZIl

2006-10-20 11:21:00 · answer #2 · answered by Herbicide 6 · 0 0

Compare Rooney and Shevchenko? Don't make me laugh! How can one compare an energetic 20-year old guy and an 30-year old useless nobody? Sorry, but Shevchenko was just a waste of money! I can't wait for the Chelsea bosses to admit it!

2006-10-20 05:40:55 · answer #3 · answered by Lana 3 · 1 1

im not a fan of chelsea. but i really do thnk they hav the better players. but football is so unpredictable and so far Chelsea is still considered a normal team. they only dominated their own league. They hav not win any European tournament as yet so still its a long way to go. For me, Drogba is the only outstanding player in Chelsea.The rest are over-rated.

2006-10-20 08:39:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

drogba is better than saha, rooney better than shev, ronaldo better than robben, essien better than carrick, makelele better than oshea, scholes better than lamps, giggs better than cole and ferdbetter than terry

player b player you cant get the true answer, but as a team, However much i hate Chelsea, I think they got better players.

2006-10-20 04:18:28 · answer #5 · answered by Geolove 3 · 0 2

chelsea has better players. ballack, drogba, schevy, cole, cech,terry

these are much bettert than the manu`s lineup - ronaldo,rooney ,van de sar ,saha, they all suck

but i hate chelsea

2006-10-20 05:06:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

both teams have great players, but Chelsea has a longer bench
plus, Chelsea has a better team spirit.

2006-10-20 05:59:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i agree with gang apart from the fact that i think united have the better team spirit both proven sides

GLORY MAN UNITED.

2006-10-20 07:22:39 · answer #8 · answered by Deano™ 7 · 0 0

Man U

2006-10-20 04:29:08 · answer #9 · answered by Arnab 2 · 0 1

Chelsea but not by far.

2006-10-20 04:23:01 · answer #10 · answered by thatniceguy 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers