the World Trade Center?
2006-10-20 03:52:06 · 14 answers · asked by ;-) 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
World Trade Center: 2,973 (not counting hijackers or those missing)
War in Iraq (latest figures I could find): 2,787 American coalition forces; 3,666 total coalition forces
2006-10-20 03:56:10 · answer #1 · answered by Joy M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So what are you really asking?
Maybe if you stood up a little straighter and walked with a little bounce in your step, you'd start thinking more clearly.
As a former Marine, I count the toll in Lebanon in Oct '83, USS Cole, a couple embassies, the barracks in Saudi in the 90's, et al. We ignored those and we got 911.
It it really numbers that matter? Or just the ancient concept of right and wrong?
If you don't think we're right, Botswana's nice this time of year.
2006-10-20 04:02:12 · answer #2 · answered by Curt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. But if you listen to the liberal media they make it sound like a massacre. Point is there has never been a war fought that didn't have casualties. This war has the lowest death toll of any American war.
2006-10-20 03:56:09 · answer #3 · answered by only p 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The lack of life toll in Iraq is a concepts below it replaced into throughout Carter. be conscious that the U. S. replaced into no longer have interaction in any conflict in any way below Carter. In different words, the lack of life toll is negligible. each and every soldier's sacrifice is important. notwithstanding, the variety of persons being killed is so low as to no longer be diverse, in any respect, then it is, in basic terms being stationed state area and doing no longer something.
2016-12-05 01:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
500,000 lost in WWII. 55,000 lost in Korea. Over 50,000 lost in Vietnam. This war is nothing like any others. And The world trade center was just a start. If we did not intervene their would be a lot more dead. Fight them in their back yard and you are safe in yours.
2006-10-20 04:06:09 · answer #5 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the death toll in WWII well bypassed those lost in Pearl Harbor. What useless point are you trying to make?
2006-10-20 03:54:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Or the death toll of S&M-AD-dim Hussein's mass graves of the tortured and the rotting and the putrifying....
2006-10-20 03:59:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 the death toll is higher. What a dumb mistake Bush made, and now he has our military dragged down in the quagmire of another insurgent war.
2006-10-20 03:54:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
NO!Not at all!The World Trade Center attacks had over 3,500 killed.The american soilder death toll is at like 1,500.
2006-10-20 03:54:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
yes.
2752 WTC
over 2800 for Iraq.
2006-10-20 03:53:03 · answer #10 · answered by Bistro 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋