2006-10-20 03:33:49 · 27 answers · asked by roshae2009 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Obviously the answer is no. He pulled a Reverse Robin Hood, and now the poor get poorer while the rich get richer.
2006-10-20 03:35:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Nope. In fact, he did not win the election in 2000. Katherine Harris disenfranchised an enormous amount of black voters. If your name was the same as a convicted criminal, or if your first initial, and your last name was the same, your name was pulled from the voter rolls. Many black people who were eligible to vote were actually stopped by Florida Highway Patrol and kept from being able to get to the polls.
Even after the voting was done, there were terrific flaws in the counting of the ballots. When the good guys asked for a re-count of the ballots, the bad guys refused to do it.
They, eventually took the case to George Herbert Walker Bush's appointees (The gang of five) on the Supreme Court, and they stopped the re-count, and appointed George Walker Bush as the president.
Later, after all ballots were finally counted, it was found that Al Gore got nearly 1,000,000 more votes than did the bad guys.
The same sort of shenanagans took place up in Ohio during the 2004 elections.
Just think, now the Republicans are foaming at their mouths with desire to place even more voting-fraud devices at the polls, you know, those Diebold computer touch-screen voting devices that have absolutely no paper trail, and can be easily hacked into?
This is why, even with elections, checks and balances are so very important!
George Walker Bush has never been the president.
He is nothing more than a cheap replica of a dictator ! ! !
2006-10-20 10:44:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely! He was the Best Man for the job. The dems outspent the Republicans something like 6 to 1 in the last election. The likes of George Soros telling me how to think or vote is repugnant. President George Bush won because he is an honest, upright person who thinks of this country first - not his money. If the dems could ever come up with candidates who do other than spue hate then they might have a chance. As I see it I'd rather have a President with a few warts that are not covered up than ones who hide what they really are and do. One example - Kerry was for the unions and the little people but Heinz company has outsourced more jobs than almost any other company.
2006-10-20 10:46:55 · answer #3 · answered by Faith White 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Regretfully, yes.
It is unfortunate that our election system is based on the Electoral rather than the Popular Vote.
Bush won in both areas, but not by much...but if America returned to the Popular Vote, there might have been more voters casting ballots.
The problem with the Electoral Vote is that if a candidate wins enough states before polls close in the West Coast states, most folks in Wash., Oregon, California, etc., will just say "oh, well" and not vote.
See link for details...you will see how close the race is, in terms of Popular Vote.
2006-10-20 11:56:19 · answer #4 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no I don't. I wouldn't vote for him if he were the last person on earth, and our world depended on one and only vote to keep the earth spinning, I would rather die. I'm watching my fellow canadians die for a cause that has no meaning anymore. Bush is a war president, and I am 100% against war...now all you bush lovers who condemned the dixie chicks for speaking their mind, I understand that belittling your president is right up there with committing murder, but as you may not know, freedom of speech actually stands for something, and it's not a priviledge that has limitations on it
2006-10-20 10:50:11 · answer #5 · answered by Mookie 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uh. Bush DID win the elections. That's why he is the president.
2006-10-20 10:42:26 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Gore was a robot and Kerry couldn't make up his mind on the issues.
2006-10-20 13:10:41 · answer #7 · answered by vickit447 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he didnt deserve to win. Bush and Kerry are cousins so it wouldnt have mattered in that situation.
www.infowars.com
2006-10-20 10:54:44 · answer #8 · answered by cecilia m 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes! I voted for him twice, and he won twice. It doesn't get any better than that! LOL
2006-10-20 10:43:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Does it really matter? he won, you voted for him,it is done.
2006-10-20 10:35:59 · answer #10 · answered by Me 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋