Umm, none of the above? Of course, I realize all the good WRs are taken. Of those listed, I'd pick Gabriel. Although Brady spreads the ball around, Gabriel seems to be first among equals. He's also the Pats big-play threat, and I just don't think much of Buffalo's D this year.
2006-10-20 06:18:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stranger In The Night 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gabriel. Williamson just sucks this year- cant catch a ball. Parker is overlooked because of Martyball. Clayton will be blanked all day by Philly's corners. Wilford may catch a few with Matt jones out, but Houston usually plays Jags tougher than people realize in Houston. There, is that good enuff explanation for taking Gabriel? geesh.
2006-10-20 03:22:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gabriel is a risk. NE can win this game but they never put up huge numbers.
Williamson is not a good choice because Seattle sometimes has a good defense.
Parker is not too bad against KC. Rivers has a good arm and likes to put it in the endzone.
Clayton is too inconsistant.
Wilford is a great choice. Jax will score all over Houston. And a lot of it will be in the air.
2006-10-20 03:23:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ottoe57 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
E. Parker or M Clayton. Parker has been steadily increasing his workload throughout the season and the KC defense isn't that good right now. Clayton is turning into a favorite target for Gradkowski and is currently the #2 receiver. I would choose between those two.
2006-10-20 05:10:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tim H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am going to choose a wide reciever that is ot on this list. Wes Welker of Miami faces Green Bay this week and is listed as the second wide reciever due to Marty Booker being out. With Joey Harrington at quarterback, Welker has averaged 8 catches per game, not to mention he will also get return yards. Welker is listed as questionable but in practice Thursday, he was said to be running at full speed.
2006-10-20 05:31:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dcboyz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, i wager moore is the unknown commodity in some concepts which might want to position him above Walters in a way. I advise bear in mind some weeks decrease back, Andre Davis replaced into the fashion for the Texans....get Davis, get Davis then what occurs he falls decrease back to earth and now its get Walters, get Walters...I advise there is an chance a similar element might want to ensue to him. Moore in difficulty-free words upsided over it truly is like I suggested he's tad extra of an unknown commodity and also you do have Brees because the QB, so double factors if it truly works out!
2016-12-05 01:04:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gabriel against a very weak buffalo def. their moral is shot after losing to detroit last week and NE will build off of that.
2006-10-20 03:17:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eric R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
wilford jax should score alot againest houston
2006-10-20 03:16:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
parker, clayton, wilford
2006-10-20 05:05:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rusty Shackleford 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
parker first then clayton second
2006-10-20 03:31:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by doublea1126 1
·
0⤊
0⤋