Discovery Channel once revealed the story of Armstrong on Moon. Giving 6 reasons or questions not answerable by NASA.
What do you guys believe.
2006-10-20 02:46:01 · 26 answers · asked by Ashish 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
This is a recurring question in pop culture. Armstrong *did* land on the moon. Here is a rebuttal to the so-called arguments of the non-believers: http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/
2006-10-20 02:49:54 · answer #1 · answered by F.G. 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
a entire of 6 manned Moon landings have been made so a techniques. all of them got here approximately between 1969 and 1972, and all and sundry carried 2 american adult males. Neil Armstrong became on the 1st one, Apollo 11, alongside with Edwin Aldrin. Out of the 12 people who've set foot on the Moon, 9 are nonetheless alive, which contain the two the Apollo 11 landing astronauts.
2016-10-02 12:04:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are always conspiracy theories and the like that are raised about every major accomplishment in space, etc.. However, I do believe (without a doubt) that Neil Armstrong did, in fact, land on the moon.
2006-10-20 03:47:00 · answer #3 · answered by Debbie M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He went there. There are people with too much time on their hands coming out with bogus stories so that can make a "documentary" or write a book about crazy conspiration theories, and get money out of it.
Since this question has been posted so often before, I will go with my customary demonstartion: in the 1960's, the US and USSR were racing to get to the moon first. If the US had faked it, you can be darn sure the Russians would have found evidence and would have gone public about the landing being a hoax. They didn't. So there.
2006-10-20 02:54:00 · answer #4 · answered by Vincent G 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do believe that Neil Among strong really went to the Moon because as evidence he did left a flag. More over if he really didn't went to the moon NASA would have been still sending men to the Moon. I have heard that one of their principle is that if they reach a destination they would go much further than.And I have heard that they are sending men to Mars which is much further than Moon.
When he went to the Moon there was a Cold War going between US and USSR. If US faked then USSR would have found some evidence against it. Hence I think he really went.
2006-10-20 03:00:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We can have effectively serious doubt about it.
It's known and recognized by CIA that a movie has been done in back up by Stanley Kubrick.
Officially the movie has not been used as the mission was a success.
Strangely all technicians participating to this movie died strangely and quickly.
Stanley Kubrick was known to be paranoiac and was living recluse afraid of the CIA... Everybody was thinking he was mad.
Last events that can strengthen this doubt is the announcement a couple of week ago that they lost the genuine movie from the mission
Somebody needs to explain me how we can lost one of the most fantastic piece of all humanity history
2006-10-20 03:48:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that he did go. On this earth for every positive aspects there would be negative aspects too. 95 percent of people still (strictly) believe that Neil Armstrong did land on Moon in 1969, however there are certain five percent people who try to increase their mere five percent in to at least ten percent by propagating negative aspects on the theory of Moon Landing. The Communist people are NO.1 in doing so because of jealousy!
2006-10-20 03:35:57 · answer #7 · answered by NUPAKRY 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i say no there is a ring of radiation around the earth caused by the sun and ozone layer ie. the radiation that don't hit earth
it was calculated that you would need 9inch of lead to block this but the rockets used had no protection in one part the hull was 1cm thick this would have meant they would had died all tho this would not affect people in orbit because they are lower then the effect.
also the flag in the video is blowing but there is no atmosphere?
also if you look at the Luna lander it has 3 reflections they only had one light and could only go out when the sun was down due to radiation.
can anyone explan my points insted of just saying he did
2006-10-20 03:25:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was a race of who was about to go to the moon first
Russians went close to the moon but didnt land
Americans say they landed on the moon
Even today just dust particles flying in the space cause severe damage to the satelites
So how can a small space shuttel with man be capabel of being exposed to the radiation of the sun where we humans cant bear it even with such a massive ozone layer
How can the american flag fly in no gravity and no air condition
So i believe americans are trying to fool the world
2006-10-20 02:58:33 · answer #9 · answered by patro_ranjan 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It amazes what bad sports the Russians are on this. You lost, deal. It would have been quite impossible to fake the landing with the technology available and every astronomer on earth watching.
Besides, great conspiracies require a level of competence you're not going to find in government today. You really believe they could not only have fake it (requiring hundreds if not thousands of people to do so) and kept it quiet 37 years?
2006-10-20 03:44:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋