Well it doesn't take a genius to work it out really does it? Blair has been up Bush's **** for so long now,and he did nothing to stop the Israel/Lebanon fighting.We're also an easier target than the US.So why does Blair still refuse to believe that he's the biggest single contributing factor to the current security state in the UK.How can he be so damn arrogant,when everybody now is telling him he's wrong?How can one man so wholeheartedly believe he's right and all the security experts/advisors are wrong.
Now today,Iran said Israel,the US,and,more worrying for me,the UK are enemies of this crazy country.Who they gonna nuke first.A pound to a penny it's the UK,because of Blair and his US led foreign policy.Anyone agree?
2006-10-20 01:42:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Since the policies forced through by the stalinist Blair have resulted in increasing the terrorist threat, and in increasing recruitment for terrorist training, (so the Government keeps telling us), is it not time that Blair was tried in court for glorification of terrorism, aiding and abetting terrorists, or any of the other liberty destroying legislation his government has introduced?
Blair is, after all, one of Al Queda's best recruiting agents. He should be charged under the laws that HE introduced.
2006-10-20 01:55:31 · answer #1 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
because tony blair is a man who doesn't give a toss about anyone else other than himself and bush. he refuses to acknowledge that had britain not gone into war with the US, london wouldn't have got bombed and a 7/7 would probably have not taken place. and osama bin laden is still on the loose, i mean, it was good getting hold of saddam hussein but what about the evil mastermind behind 9/11 and the july 7 bombings, eh? what actual progress have they made to finding and capturing bin laden and putting an end to the taliban regime, eh? when in reality they haven't got anywhere in getting hold of that evil bastard, he's still on the run sadly and yet we wonder why britain is a terrorist threat. tony blair is trying to fool us by denying that he is partly responsible for the mess this country is in when it is so obvious, he is too naive and so far up his backside to ever listen to us.
if iran does nuke britain, then by god, all hell would break loose and not forgetting that blair's repuation is further tarnished. then again, it is and was already going downhill anyway.
2006-10-22 05:44:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rich Brit Corps realize that the fake threats work really well in the US so they just wanted to make a profit in the shams too.
All Tony Blair have to do is wave a flag and a Bible.
2006-10-20 01:48:39 · answer #3 · answered by Taco 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I cant beleive the world we live in its awful! I keep thinking about having children but all this stuff really makes me have 2nd thoughts, who wants to bring innocent children into this world where you cant get on a bus for fear of being blown up or go on holiday on a plane incase some nutcase decides to take it hostage and fly it into a building!
What is this world? Its like a nightmare that none of us are ever going to wake up from, this is it. It is never going to get any better!!
As far as im concerned were all screwed! Really wish we wasnt as it would be lovely to live in a peaceful world but with leaders like we have we have no chance
2006-10-20 02:18:41 · answer #4 · answered by kirsty m 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that isn't something new. New international Order, the Amero, NAU, the coolest ole CFR. tell me approximately it. i'm attempting to get a activity and can't for the existence of me get one b/c i found out archives on a govt entity and that they caught some crap on my checklist and that i had 5 human beings desirous to employ me this month and then they despatched me a "Sorry, no jobs obtainable" letter. so a procedures the only suggestion i've got been waiting to get is to alter my call and pass to a distinctive state. i might desire to get a activity to get the money to pass. in spite of the fact that i do no longer trust Brezinski, surely I DO agree yet i do unlike what he's saying, there isn't any longer lots that Obama can do approximately it considering he's CFR. yet, I DO like Obama and that i think that if some thing ought to be argued and won with the CFR that Obama often is the guy to be waiting to do it. the problem is that Bush has left this style of mess for Obama that it will take him 4 years just to straighten out the mess and categorize each and every thing and then start to whittle away at it. Bush has had 8 years and many advisers plus, i'm effective, the entire efforts and backing and supplies of the CFR, to place in lots CRAP into the device that it will take a felony wizard to resolve this entire mess. yet, given sufficient time i'm effective Obama is up for the activity. i'm effective we are going to might desire to re-% him for yet another 4 years in spite of the indisputable fact that plainly like he is going to start his activity together with his "weapons blazing" and his presidential decrees flying so shall we see what he can do. Brezinski became maximum possibly given to him via the CFR on a take him or take him form determination. What if Obama can get Brezinski to shift and get him on Obama's area and paintings with Obama to alter the CFR? I observed the President of Iran interior the CFR council chambers ... do no longer be attentive to if he have been given everywhere with them, sorta doubt it ... yet while they're going to pay attention to HIM they might desire to have no problem sitting down with Obama and dealing issues out "jointly". Do you settle? Or might desire to I only smoke a bowl and placed the crimson massive call on my front door? Peace, Love, and lightweight! i'm Dartagnon
2016-12-16 10:49:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or have you considered that much like Bush, they too are working alphabetically?
2006-10-20 02:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by sarcasticquotemarks 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you think it would be better to do nothing,just sit back and let al'queda take over the world.
2006-10-20 01:52:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
well you have answered that question yourself.hand in hand with the states has done this
2006-10-20 01:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by martin r 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the brittish muslims are more willing to attack their host countrie
2006-10-20 19:50:29 · answer #9 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are probably jealous that we have more Muslims than they have, but if they ask us nicely they can have them all back, not that fond of them any way. :(
2006-10-20 02:55:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋