http://media.putfile.com/jet-into-concrete-barrier
This will give you a rough idea of a plane hitting a reinforced wall.
2006-10-20 00:51:12 · 9 answers · asked by Meow the cat 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Come on folks, I'm trying to view this from the mindset of a Democrat tinfoilhatter, help me out okay.
2006-10-20 01:02:11 · update #1
Darn 5 answers and no one blames Bush yet.
2006-10-20 01:02:46 · update #2
That's a good one.
2006-10-20 00:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by icetender 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The concrete wall has no windows, the aircraft is made of carbon fiber therefore totally different from an airliner.
Please be clear, I have never said that a boeing passenger airliner never hit the pentagon. But we have never seen proof in the form of the numerous videos that were taken.
The only trial to do with 911 has been completed, the official commision has completed and made it's report public and since has admitted mistakes in it.
But for some reason, Despite the two towers attacks being shown over and over again (to remind us to praise the republicans or face more of the same) we are not considered worthy of being able to view the PROOF of what happened.
The only videos released have shown nothing more than a blur.
I am not pushing or promoting any conspiracy theory here. EVERY conspiracy theory I have researched (including the official one) has got holes in. In fact the official one IS one of the worst.
IF 911 happened the way the Government INSISTS it did, HOW would showing the videos hurt? HOW?
I would like to see the video of that plane hitting the pentagon and mostly vanishing. It would shut up many of the nutters in the 911 truth (conspiracy theory crank) movement.
Then we could focus on the real anomolies of the official version of 911, and the incompetence and criminal neglect of the administration of not only ignoring the threats, but enacting policies that specifically assisted in allowing (whether by negligent accident or design) Those attacks to happen.
2006-10-20 08:12:32 · answer #2 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The concrete wall experienced a lack of a clean, sheer hole.
I sincerely doubt the plane would have atomised. Of course, the government could quickly make it clear what happened, if it released a single frame of footage from all the cameras it confiscated.
2006-10-20 08:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Interesting.
2006-10-20 08:04:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I see the test wall has no windows.
2006-10-20 08:00:27 · answer #5 · answered by bill a 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plane was not traveling fast enough and there was not a big explosion which seems to indicate it was not loaded with enough jet fule......good try though.
2006-10-20 08:09:01 · answer #6 · answered by mrfoxhorn 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that should keep you busy for the next 40 years.
2006-10-20 07:58:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't wonder ,anymore, it will hurt, whats left of your brain.
2006-10-20 07:56:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yup
2006-10-20 07:54:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋