the first was in1997 and the 2 was in2000.
2006-10-20 00:50:07 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Women's Health
I dont think so given the 2 previous pregnancies but then you might need to confirm with the obstetrician. I`m sure your doctor would have told you that Caesarian section is the only option but if you wish to double check , consult another obstetrician not Yahoo answers!!!
2006-10-20 02:33:13 · answer #1 · answered by st_ranger_121 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Be back.
I am back.
It is possible but most doctors do not like to risk it.
Some state will not allow it because of the risk (I believe, the State of Idaho in USA).
Main risk is that labour may cause the internal old stitches to fail in that case, the delivery get more complex and if not noticed or found, the infection would set in, it can kill the woman in a rear case.
2006-10-20 08:56:44 · answer #2 · answered by minootoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think its all dependant on the reason you had a c-section in the first place. If your body cannot give natural birth then no.3 will be a ceasar but if not then I don't see why you can't give birth naturally.
2006-10-20 08:11:56 · answer #3 · answered by tay_jen1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm only a man, but my x-wife was in the same situation. We had this real good baby doctor from UofM Women's hospital, she told my wife that after two(2) C-Sections most Pedes doctors recommend nothing but thereafter. I guess it depends on your doctor sweetheart. I wish you all the best..........LATER
2006-10-20 08:04:20 · answer #4 · answered by veteranpainter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is , your doctor will have to monitor your last trimester carefully.Congrats and God Bless!!
2006-10-20 08:01:26 · answer #5 · answered by LiveLaughLove'12 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋