One that can never be represented by another one is not an idea. Is this a correct statement?

Question

One that can never be represented by another one is not an idea.

One can represent another one only if there is no fundamental difference among our ideas on different things.

Answer 1

Depends on the definition of what is fundamental, and this dependence on the definition is based on level of perception.

Answer 2

I beg to differ. The idea is really supposed to be in reality. Its existence in the ideal world. It may have to be established in the practical world, by the preacher of the idea or ideal himself trying to live up to the idea and set an example. A new idea often takes root as an antithesis to an existing idea. The propound of the new idea will have to struggle hard to sell that idea before that idea becomes currency. Let us assume that the idea of chastity. In a world of amorality and unfaithfulness, this idea is a hard idea seldom practised and unknown to all. When this occurs as an anti-dotes to many of the social ills that the society is suffering from, the person who preaches it will have to be a living example of the idea and slowly that will command a good following. Hence, expecting that there need to be another idea to represent a new idea is not a good idea.

Answer 3

I beg to differ. The idea is really supposed to be in reality. Its existence in the ideal world. It may have to be established in the practical world, by the preacher of the idea or ideal himself trying to live up to the idea and set an example. A new idea often takes root as an antithesis to an existing idea. The propound of the new idea will have to struggle hard to sell that idea before that idea becomes currency. Let us assume that the idea of chastity. In a world of amorality and unfaithfulness, this idea is a hard idea seldom practised and unknown to all. When this occurs as an anti-dotes to many of the social ills that the society is suffering from, the person who preaches it will have to be a living example of the idea and slowly that will command a good following. Hence, expecting that there need to be another idea to represent a new idea is not a good idea.

Answer 4

its not reasonable, absurd and illogical because one here means
a person and not an idea.

ur second statement is better but using fundamental with difference is absurd. The word difference can stand alone.
Coherence is important. ur attempt at writing in this manner
only means that you have not understood some writers.

Answer 5

What is an idea? It is defined as an estimate: an approximate calculation of quantity or degree or worth... When one gets an idea it is either from a statement or a belief.

Thus i believe the statement is correct... Yet whose idea was it in the first place

Answer 6

One is not an idea _ this is your question. It is not complete even with your parenthetic explanation.
Statement is not correct.

Answer 7

This is a question that can only be answered by......
SUPER LAWYER.

I AM

Answer 8

no.