English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is a fact. Go to google video and type in WTC 7 collapse and then respond to me. Don't respond if you are too lazy to look into it.
Thank You.

2006-10-19 16:33:52 · 21 answers · asked by Peter F 1 in Politics & Government Government

21 answers

just like hitler did for the enabling act bush did for the patriot act

2006-10-19 17:26:49 · answer #1 · answered by periacs 2 · 0 1

the fact is that the official story believers will not look at all the evidence.And when it is offerred to them their retort is name calling /What is with that anyway?here is a link with an interesting picture.If you scroll down on the linkyou will come to a pic of a cut column.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/240406thermiteidentified.htm
no one disputes that this picture is real.I spent a number of years in steel building construction,commercial diving,cutting ,salvage and demolition.And I will tell you.That is not a torch cut and it is entirely consistent with a directional set charge.
The best publication that I have found that deals with WTC 7 is"the new pearl harbour" by Griffin
the truth is overwhelming.I mean after I read the 9/11 commission report and the above mentioned book,i was in a stae of shock for severla days.I just couldnt believe it.But there lies the evidence.
Govt disinformation for profit.In this case oil and ordnance sales.Why is that so hard to believe.The concept has been around for ever.Does anyone remember the Maddox from vietnam?

2006-10-19 23:44:36 · answer #2 · answered by Paul I 4 · 1 1

I looked at the photo of the column above the fireman. It looks EXACTLY as if it has been cut with a torch. Any charge capable of cutting that column wouldn't leave molten metal running down the side of it. How naive

2006-10-20 01:59:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your question has been rated BNI (Below Normal Intelligence) or NWA (Not Worthy of and Answer). The reason for this rating may be that your question is immature, non seneschal, baited, insignificant, and ranting or just plain dumb. You should try revising your question to incorporate some intelligence, wisdom, insight or value that the answerer will be more likely to find engaging or thought provoking. Not only will this improve the chances of your question being answered but also keeps answers from falling asleep or clicking that annoying little thumbs down icon. Thank you.

2006-10-19 23:35:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

No doubt about it. Controlled demolitions take at least a week to set up. So they had to have foreknowledge of the attacks. Then take into account the admission by owner Larry Silverstien who stated that the building was pulled.

2006-10-20 00:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Luke F 3 · 0 2

You see the level of thinking relected in the "level" of "answers." The only decent answer was for the patriot's side of the argument.

I'd also like to know why they GOT RID of the EVIDENCE of the ENTIRE twin towers!!! That in itself was illegal.



"An error doesn't become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." - Orlando A. Battista

2006-10-20 01:55:11 · answer #6 · answered by sincere12_26 4 · 0 1

Did you ask your Mommy if you could stay up late?

You must be very young, or just have zero common sense. Stop embarrassing yourself and go to bed.

2006-10-20 02:07:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

At this point and faced with the documented evidence

OF:
THERMATE
BOMBS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE
FREEFALL INTO FOOTPRINT
DETONATION SQUIBS
SMOLDERING POOLS OF MOLTEN STEEL FOR WEEKS
KRONGARD INSIDER TRADING ('PUTS' ON UNITED AND AMERICAN)
BLATENT BLDG 7 DEMO-IMPLOSION
SILVERSTEIN'S "PULL IT"
PEOPLE WARNED NOT TO FLY
PROVEN FAKE OBL TAPES
7 OF 19 ALIVE
NO ARABS ON ANY FLIGHT MANIFESTS
NORAD STAND DOWN ORDER
CNN REPORT OF "NO PLANE AT PENTAGON"
RUMSFELD ADMITTING A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON
RUMSFELD ADMITTING FLT 93 WAS SHOT DOWN
MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS WARGAMES ON 9-11 OF THE EXACT SCENERIO
FEMA'S ARRIVAL TO LOWER MANHATTAN ON SEPT.10TH
PNAC'S PUBLISHED NEED FOR A "NEW PEARL HARBOR"
SS NOT REACTING TO GOAT READING CHIMP TARGET
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
THE DOWNING STREET MEMO
BUSH'S DIARY ENTRY 'NEW PEARL HARBOR'

ANYONE STILL CLINGING TO THE BUSHCO ISSUED FAIRYTALE IS EITHER A DOWN SYNDROME VICTIM OR SOMEONE WHO WOULD FOLLOW BUSH'S LIES TO THEIR GRAVE.

THERE'S NO MORE DEBATING

THAT'S THE END OF THIS STORY

2006-10-20 00:07:43 · answer #8 · answered by mikeygonebad 2 · 2 2

It's a fact???? So YOU were there. You saw the explosives. Wow.

2006-10-19 23:42:58 · answer #9 · answered by GUNNSLINGER 3 · 1 0

I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

The big word here is TRUTH.

The day that your word or even my word becomes truth is the day the sun explodes.

2006-10-19 23:37:45 · answer #10 · answered by High-strung Guitarist 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers