Since Booker T has evolved into the arrogant, egotistical King Booker, he has been having issues with his attitude. Is it time for him to get off his high horse and face reality like a real man or would his number-one competitor do that for him forcefully? Please explain why you think so.
2006-10-19 16:05:32 · 9 answers · asked by brian 2010 7 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Booker T has endured a lot to get where he is so i respect him for that, but sooner or later someone is going to knock him off his throne and remeber "the higher you are the harder you fall"
2006-10-19 16:17:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Agreed but Booker needs to drop the gimmicks. WWE is making him out to be a clown. Going back to stupid gimmicks that make good wrestlers and performers look like fools
2006-10-19 23:55:48 · answer #2 · answered by ktar0420 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
King booker is a concieted little Prick and if somebody doesnt take him off his high horse soon he might try to overrule teddy long sigh so sad!
2006-10-20 08:17:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Booker T is way to into himself and he isn't nearly as good (or good looking, for that matter) as Batista. I sure wish Batista would come back to RAW!
2006-10-19 23:12:36 · answer #4 · answered by hollyhock 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bookers thre only one on smackdown that deserves to hold the title accept maybe benoit
2006-10-19 23:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You sir are a peasant.
You will one day kiss King Booker's feet.
ALL HAIL KING BOOKER!
2006-10-20 01:47:02 · answer #6 · answered by Andrew S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
king booker rules wrestling worldwide
all hail king booker
2006-10-19 23:07:15 · answer #7 · answered by Crude 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
YES YES YES and also he as to walk faster and say he OWN NAME RIGHT IT Booker NOT BOOKAKC or what he says
2006-10-19 23:09:36 · answer #8 · answered by JEFF HARDY #1 FAN 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah he is going to have to cus the animal is back and he wants his title back and he has a chance tonight on smack down!
2006-10-20 12:59:41 · answer #9 · answered by A true mark 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋