free gift from u,s,a to north korea,?

Question

destroy their nucler reactors, u,s,a first strike ,with free bounus gift of no charge to them,also include free warning label for no use of fusion bombs,could it happen ?if so how soon?

Answer 1

If they sell nukes, then nuke first, talk later !!

Answer 2

A USA first strike is not that unlikely, but North Korea is no push-over.

Chances are North Korea is trying to flex its nuclear muscle so as to act as a deterrent to the US first strike. They saw what happened to WMD devoid Iraq, so are trying to avoid the same fate.

The best thing for the USA is that North Korea is far, very far, and any nuclear strike would affect North Korea, South Korea, may be Japan in the medium run. The only US citizens affected would be soldiers in SOuth Korea who should have the equipment to survive the aftermath of a nuclear strike.

Therefore there would be very little complaints from the US if North Korea is nuked.

The only issue would be if North Korea manages to shoot its missiles and if these are already nuclear tipped. Japan might suffer a lot. But then again, I don't think that enters the equation.

However, China could use this as a pretext to mobilise the PLA and march down, finally getting access to the Indian Ocean, likely via Myanmar. That would certainly make China much much stronger than now, and much more of a threat to the USA.

Therefore I think that if the US does give this gift, it will come back and bite.

Answer 3

China will knock out N.Korea if it comes to that. Remember they do have the largest military force on Earth. The sad part is the average N.Korean doesn't even know what is going on in the outside world, because their gov't treats them like mushrooms. The sooner N.Korea is decimated the better. It would also give a clear indication to Iran what is going to happen if they keep messing about.

Answer 4

You nuclear nuts and warmongers should know that if any country drops a nuclear bomb on another then the world has three weeks before an all out nuclear war. People would be nervous that nuclear states can act in such a criminal fashion that other large nuclear states would get their strikes in before they become victims. Anyway would any of you support a President who authorises such an action? I would have him down as an out and out nutter who should be locked up.

Answer 5

George Bush is obsessed on Iraq, and since he is obsessed on Iraq, nothing else matters to him. Not until Bush gets out of office is there a snowflake's chance in hell of ANY sort of action of ANY kind against North Korea. Bush has only one obsession and that is Iraq, so forget about North Korea. The North Koreans could send a missile to blow up in Alaska and Bush wouldn't even notice, he is so fixated on Iraq. To illustrate how compulsed he is, he went after non-existent nukes in Iraq, didn't find any, and kept on keeping on anyway. Meanwhile, North Korea blows off a nuclear bomb and Bush ignores it completely. The only thing he sees is Iraq, and that's it. Period.

Answer 6

Wont happen,we have too many panty waisted cowards that want us to get hit first then we will have a reason to take care of N korea,look what they are saying about Iraq..,no matter what the President does it wont be right in the eyes of the left.

Answer 7

I think north korea would put up a pretty good fight.

Answer 8

that would start another Korea war an we lost the first one maybe we should go about it different

Answer 9

HERE IS ONE GOOD REASON FOR THE NORTH KOREA MESS:::::::::::::::With the Democrats' full-throated moralizing of late, I'm almost tempted to vote for them --
although perhaps "full-throated" is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals.
The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer
to talk about anything other than national security.

Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes,
raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration's 1994 "peace" deal with North Korea.

At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats' hypocritical grandstanding
was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.

Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour,
bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea --
keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.

In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter -- probably collect --
who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: "Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud,
and I've worked out a terrific deal. I'll give you the details later."

Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to
cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.

Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes --
more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return,
they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted
the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much
we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.

The famed "allies," whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea.
Japan and South Korea -- actual allies, unlike France and Germany -- were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.

If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as "a resounding triumph."

At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape
weapons inspections for five years would "preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next
U.S. president's administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making."

And then on Oct. 17, 2002 -- under a new administration, you'll note -- The New York Times reported on the front page,
so you couldn't have missed it: "Confronted by new American intelligence,
North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years."

So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence,
lest anyone ask, "Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?"

But by Richardson's lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil.
He said, "When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy."
This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann,
not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel
"that there's too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it's a cry for attention."
If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan.
But Richardson says Kim "psychologically feels he's been dissed, that he's not treated with respect."

Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers
(and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes
like the Clinton administration did.

As Richardson said, Kim "wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration."

To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea
cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in
1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.

When pressed by CNN's Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented
the North Koreans from building nukes "for eight years" -- i.e., right up until the day
The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes "for the past several years."

Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce.
In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action.
Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.
THIS ARTICLE BY ANN COULTER::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Answer 10

sounds good to me and does the young lady above now anything apart from " I can,t know "?