You are right.
Bush has dug this country into a huge hole. We have no way to stop the insurgency in Iraq and if we pull out the whole region will go up in flames along with oil prices.
He is a nut job.
2006-10-19 15:56:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by imnogeniusbutt 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Much as I dislike Bush, it seems pretty obvious that Clinton, Bush, and Reagan did *not* get the job done, or we would not be doing it now.
But, I think Mr. Bush's tactics and strategies in fighting it are messed up, I think he intentionally *lied* to the American public (about WMD) because that was the only way he could get support for a war he wanted anyway. As a US citizen living overseas (China), for the first time I now identify myself as Canadian to cab drivers because I don't want to be in a position of being expected to support US policies.
2006-10-19 16:02:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by sofarsogood 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kind of a silly question isn't it? First of all Clinton didn't do squat. He could have but we all know he passed up every opportunity he had to deal with bin laden, was too busy trying to figure out the deffinition of the word "is". Obviously the terrorism threat was escalated during this administration with the attacks of 9/11 and others around the world. Thank God we have THIS president at THIS time who had the guts to deal with the threat this time. He may not be able to say nuclear but I'll bet he knows the meaning of the word "is".
2006-10-19 16:00:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
give them what they want and they will leave use alone,also wish it away works too used to work anyway,,the price of roasted human flesh increased over the years,Clinton,that's funny i would not put him in the mad cow fields with the bush babies,regan rocked,not to be a Monday morning quarterback but times and death ways have changed like the chickens of time ,humans eat the **** that falls,now its falling harder and harder,lets just leave god and faith out of this mess for now,once its over then we can check our true blues..for now lets grease the green tip 223 bullets for their days a coming and the targets will be put in hell and their names will be ALL TERRORIST....
2006-10-19 16:11:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by CIVILIAN 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton fought terrorist?? ... Huh, I missed that headline.
Rather President Bush is fighting the war that Clinton ignored.
BTW, President Ronald Reagan's name is spelled with two a's.
2006-10-19 15:51:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by ValleyR 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
The Islamic nuts got their biggest bolster in 1979 when Carter convinced the shah of Iran to let Khomeini come back to Iran and to not commit any human rights violation against him and his gang. Look what happened next.
2006-10-19 15:55:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ronnie RAYGUN (one A) armed them, daddy bush trained them and Clinton tried diplomacy (which unfortunately failed) and now gw uses them to control the weak and infirm of the mind.
2006-10-19 15:56:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kevin O 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Who ever said it was going to be easy or that freedom is not expensive?
2006-10-19 16:27:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing I see bush fighting are the Democrats.
As for looking for terrorists - I wonder........
2006-10-19 15:54:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Calee 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Islam has been around for over 1000years. the fight to keep it form taking over has never stopped.
2006-10-19 15:53:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋