2006-10-19 15:48:44 · 8 answers · asked by Peter F 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
WTC-7? The SMOKING GUN. Try as they might, the sheeple cannot explain away this one...
2006-10-19 15:57:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe because that was the first time a 767 at full power and full of fuel ever crashed on a steel building?
2006-10-19 16:05:08 · answer #2 · answered by northmiamibeach1975 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is unbelievable. Just search WTC7 for lots of sites that detail the odd collapse.
There is also this one, which discusses the use of small hydrogen bombs. They're really "small," so to speak, and ultra secret (if true, of course). They apparently don't require an atomic bomb to set them off (lasers?).
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x65477
I'm also wondering what will be done with this technology in the (near) future, especially given super-secrecy and the adventurism of the administration.
2006-10-19 16:11:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes you are right, right before the plane supposedly strikes the towers you can clearly see Elvis carrying large amounts of C 4 into the building. The truth cannot be denied.
See more at my web site www.iamaloser.com
2006-10-19 16:42:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
dude, you need to watch the video, hours after 1and 2 fell, with nothing going on..... free fall
2006-10-19 18:20:19 · answer #5 · answered by jjayflash9 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's history, get over it! I've never seen Amerrcans enjoy the deaths of theere fellow Amerrcans so much! (Did that shut you up?)
2006-10-19 15:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I know for a fact that it was space people in UFOs.
2006-10-19 16:43:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is with these conspiracy theory cultists?
Try taking Engineering 101 and then come back and talk.
2006-10-19 15:57:46 · answer #8 · answered by $Sun King$ 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋