I traded steve smith and mike anderson
for
Andre Johnson and Kevin Jones
2006-10-19 13:12:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
That was an excellent trade - Andre Johnson is somehow flying under the radar, but he's been having a fantastic fantasy season...mike anderson is basically worthless at RB, so the upgrade to kevin jones is great for your team...and while steve smith is probably the best fantasy WR, the boost in RB strength far outweighs the loss in WR strength. Good trade.
2006-10-19 14:39:28 · answer #1 · answered by Ben R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Andre Johnson is very consistent right now with 100 yard games. Kevin Jones for Mike Anderson is good that gives you a few yards not alot. With Keyshawn in Carolina Steve Smith gets robbed of production and he is injury prone. So good trade.
2006-10-19 21:34:28 · answer #2 · answered by The Air Shake 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't really like the trade because Steve Smith gets a lot of touchdowns but this could prove to be a good one if Kevin Jones and Andre Johnson start having great years or if your backup RB wasn't good you just have gotten a great deal.
2006-10-19 20:22:15 · answer #3 · answered by brosen_ber 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well mike anderson is an interesting throw in,. i dont really know why you would have him on your team in the first place....
so basically its steve smith for a johnson and KJ
Steve Smith is prolly a top 3 fantasy wide.... Johnson has to be close to top 5.... KJ is really inconsistent this year it seems....
its even i suppose and gives u a little more depth
2006-10-19 20:26:34 · answer #4 · answered by p0etree 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems good to me u traded a rb that does not play for a rb is playing real well. Yes u traded the one the best wr but getting johnson is not a bad trade off.
2006-10-19 20:23:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anderson s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Under no circumstance would I have traded Steve Smith away. He is one of the super stars in the leauge and good for at least one touchdown per week. That also depends on the rest of your lineup. If you were deep at the WR and were hurting at RB only then would this trade make sense. Other than that you got hosed.
2006-10-19 20:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by Will T 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no im sorry that was really dumb actually andre johnson is the number 1 reciver for a offense that has no offence and kevin jones had two ok games but he's speratic at best and has been a bust the last two years.
2006-10-19 21:14:35 · answer #7 · answered by casper 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
mike anderson....u don't need him. And yes, fair trade.
2006-10-19 22:45:11 · answer #8 · answered by Darren G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
great trade. both AJ and KJ are gonna continue to produce.
2006-10-19 20:21:20 · answer #9 · answered by ptaewk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yup
2006-10-19 20:15:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋