It seems to me that the cons are trying to find every opportunity to escape from the quagmire they have created in Iraq. They want to leave our military high and dry. Isn't this just typical? Blame somebody else for their failures.
2006-10-19 11:26:02 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The republican campaign ads rarely mention Iraq recently. Are they hiding from something?
2006-10-19 11:36:12 · answer #1 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what you think they are "cutting and running" from - common decency, basic human rights, a sense of responsibility to the troops, etc. Cons are "cutting and running" from all of these. But, heaven forbid we should "cut and run" from Iraq.
Bush has said we will "stand down when they stand up". Now he says no troop reductions until after 2010. He must have a pretty poor impression of his puppet Iraqi government and the American troops training their military. Basic training in this country takes 2-3 months. In Iraq, I guess, it'll take 5 or 6 years.
As for truckman's eloquent response, I can't imagine why Democrats would want to redeploy troops to suppress a nation that actually HAS nuclear weapons and intercontinental missiles. The sheer NERVE of these people wanting to address a nation that is actually a THREAT to the US.
2006-10-19 11:39:24 · answer #2 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cut and run is just a buzz phrase and totally inappropriate for what is now exactly like the Tet Offensive in the Viet Nam war.
2006-10-19 11:33:02 · answer #3 · answered by beez 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
makes you ask your self about the authentic want of the GOP? They led to the first civil conflict they were in means in the course of the fall that delivered about the excellent melancholy. They were the in difficulty-free words ones to ever have a President resign in shame and then later to be pardoned so the country might want to "heal" Reagan Yeah he replaced into large yet then there replaced into the Iran contra mess and the slaughter of truly some Marines in Lebanon the first Bush delivered about the introduction of the monster we now comprehend as Bin weighted down and the 2d Bush truly enable 9-11 ensue you would possibly want to say if the guy we elected in 2000 Gore replaced into in means it would want to have grew to change into out in a unique way (Gore on notwithstanding the electorial collegle gave the gig to Bush) So who precisely does the GOP paintings for it certainly isn't the yankee human beings
2016-12-05 00:35:22 · answer #4 · answered by golub 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean like the liberals blaming every thing they can think of on Bush. The liberals want to leave our military high and dry.Isn't it just typical.Blame Bush for their failures.
2006-10-19 11:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Talking Points!
2006-10-19 11:28:13 · answer #6 · answered by Bawney 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh, they're working a way to extracate us from the mess. Hence the "code" talking that we're re-evaluating things.
Next thing you know, they'll announce we're pulling out and have a time table.
can you say flip-flopping cut-and-runner?
2006-10-19 11:30:40 · answer #7 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not to mention the Republicans are cut-and-running on N. Korea when they are farther along in their weapons program then Iran.
2006-10-19 11:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"cut and run" is a term karl rove has inspired. It is best swallowed with kool aid. it simply means you disagree with the way this war was started or is being conducted. nothing more.
2006-10-19 11:52:23 · answer #9 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think its the easy solution that the dems are calling for. the reps who got us into the situation are unrealistically optimistic, but i dont think cut and run is what most of them are aiming at - but getting out asap is the best solution for everyone.
2006-10-19 11:30:36 · answer #10 · answered by kujigafy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋