...and fund candidates with public money, limit commercial air time, and restrict campaigns to the 90 days prior to elections? Would that help level the playing field, which now allows only those with family fortunes to stake them? And would it help to elect candidates on some basis other than image?
2006-10-19 11:18:00 · 5 answers · asked by keepsondancing 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, we definitely should severely limits campaign funds and limit commercial air time. I think 90 days is too short, maybe six months. We'd see a whole new administration.
2006-10-19 11:20:37 · answer #1 · answered by beez 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the US should move to a Publicly funded political campaigns and really enforce it against special interest groups and other PAC's.
2006-10-19 11:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unConstitutional in usa. The superb courtroom has governed that "unfastened speech" skill political speech. jointly as the small print at the instant are not yet company and extremely final, seek for this to take place interior 5 years as modern-day circumstances are appealed.
2016-11-23 19:58:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would destroy many rich Democrats.
But it would also do away with freedom>
Why are you against freedom?
Is freedom hurting you somehow?
2006-10-19 11:22:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you all right in my book
2006-10-19 11:21:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋