English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-19 11:16:53 · 10 answers · asked by Ivan 3 in Politics & Government Government

10 answers

This war is USA oil war. Most British opposed the war. 5 years down the line, it is proved that the British people were right and Blair was wrong, but he still lives in denial. He has to go!
The results of this war is:
hundreds of dead British young soldiers. hundreds thousands Iraqi killed, a whole country is totally messed up forever, Iraq became the best place to cultivate terrorists, 7/7 was one of the results of this war, UK has lost its credibility in the world and most countries see Blair as Bush little poodle (shoulder to shoulder).

2006-10-19 11:22:35 · answer #1 · answered by Abularaby 4 · 1 0

There is (and was) very little support for the war here in the UK. Tony Blair was the only European leader to support the US. All others were calling for more diplomacy, but the 2 of us went it alone and kicked *** in the middle east. We now have over 2,700 US troops over 100 British dead. Should Tony Blair get the support for the war? ask the families of the dead.

2006-10-19 18:37:57 · answer #2 · answered by Albert Hall 2 · 0 0

No, he got sucked in to being Bush's puppet. As John Howard did also. Only Tony Blair is a socialist and socialists aren't supposed to be war-mongers.

2006-10-19 18:22:37 · answer #3 · answered by Aussie Chick 5 · 2 0

What does it matter?
According to opinion polls before the invasion of Iraq, over 80% of the British population were against an invasion.
He ignored the people and you still voted him back in.
Do you think he really cares?

2006-10-19 18:27:31 · answer #4 · answered by rosbif 6 · 2 0

in my opinion no he got bulled into it from the USA and as we are Allies with them he could not say no he is not going to support them in the war. + Bush has too much of his personal opinion in what he does instead of the right way of his countries needs

2006-10-19 18:20:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. The British people didn't want to get involved in Bush's war in the first place.

2006-10-19 18:18:55 · answer #6 · answered by JS 3 · 2 1

No - he should get a damn good slapping, and should be tarred and feathered or dressed in corduroy and given a good kicking.

2006-10-19 18:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by bovie 4 · 3 0

heck no, should have left the USA to it, you just know they would have been arrogant enough to go it alone

2006-10-19 18:27:38 · answer #8 · answered by timone 5 · 1 0

No. He's already getting too much back-door lovin' from Bush.

2006-10-19 18:24:17 · answer #9 · answered by Red 4 · 2 1

you guys in the UK should help us eradicte all of Islam

2006-10-19 18:26:13 · answer #10 · answered by Seaman Staines 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers