For a group of people who are constantly harping and preaching about tolerance and inclusion for all people, the democrats sure are quick to shun and dismiss people aren't they?
Lieberman has been stabbed in the back by the same people who would support to the death, Bill Clinton, who while President, claimed to smoke but not inhale marijuana and tried to convince everyone of us there was more than one definition for the word "is", dependent upon if he did or did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.
The democrats are made up of a pack of wolves dressed in sheep's clothing. We now have hard, irrefutable, undeniable evidence that the democrats are the most intolerant,
prejudice, exclusionary group of politicians in America. Those of us who have eyes to see and ears to hear have known and understood this the entire time. Lets all watch closely and see how anti-Israel the democrats become now that they have dropped Lieberman, who is also Jewish.
The only question remaining is, how many people out there are still blind to the truth?
2006-10-19 13:50:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by bowtierodz 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
speaking from someone FROM Connecticut and who voted for him, Lieberman is giant. he's accurate in the middle (and he's no longer a Democrat. he's an autonomous). I agreed with lots of his stances and he replaced into one hundred% situations extra constructive than Ned Lamont. in case you had heard Ned Lamont attempting for workplace...yeah, you would possibly want to've voted for Lieberman too. and albeit, at the same time as the time comes, i am going to vote for him back.
2016-12-05 00:35:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by golub 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's one state, that's on the more liberal end of the spectrum, not voting for him...
it wasn't a national primary... all dems didn't make this decision... just a very small percent of the nation's dems in a very small northern state...
but it's democracy in action... I mean Repubs have been dumping on McCain for a long time now... and I suspect if he runs in the Repub presidential primary, he will get much the same treatment as Joe... both parties have those that cross the lines that they don't like...
2006-10-19 11:37:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Pretty interesting,Most people don't want the far left liberal agenda that his opponent stands for, maybe not enough people voted in the primary to make this apparent, but sure looks like they woke up now.
2006-10-19 11:28:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Dumb move! Ned Lamont mush be "lamenting" that he has spent over $!0 MILLION for his own money and still is trailing! What is it with the Demoncrats claiming they are for the little man, but they are all millionaires!
2006-10-19 11:21:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's a democrat supporting Bush. He deserves to be dumped but it looks like he'll win. It's a win-win situation for the democrats.
2006-10-19 11:39:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by tyrone b 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I tell thy needed to do this.kissing George bush like that
2006-10-19 11:20:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It sure shows how afraid they are of diverse views and dissenting opinions, doesn't it!?!?
2006-10-19 11:22:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pete 4
·
3⤊
0⤋