English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979024486145&q=the+truth+of+911

2006-10-19 11:03:58 · 15 answers · asked by Jude 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

That video is too long to watch at this moment, however I do know that Dubya's grand pappy dealed with Hitler. More specifically, he was recruited by the American government to secure the transactions, and make the paperwork legitimate. He was a brilliant banker and diplomat, and the potential for politics shone through. After the US supplied the Holocaust and needed plausible deniability, old Prescott Bush was hired again to make the paperwork 'go away'. He did this pretty well, destroying as many documents as he could and 'hiding' the rest of them in a sea of red tape bureaucratic formalities. That was how the Bush family got into politics, the CIA, and the Federal government were so proud of him, that they helped him push further along as a "legitimate" politician, after all the evidence that we powered the Holocaust and carefully covered our tracks before making another move was covered up.
So in closing I'd just like to point out that America specifically funded Hitler and sold Germany the majority of the cyanide it used in concentration camps. Prescott Bush made minor contribution to the funds, but he was hired to be the liaison between the US and Nazi Germany.

2006-10-19 11:26:28 · answer #1 · answered by Rick R 5 · 1 0

Yeah. But this was not uncommon among American bankers, because he funded Hitler before the Holocaust; he funded him during the Great Depression. Many people funded him because he seemed like a good investment at the time; everyone was looking for a little extra money. Plus, George Bush isn't his grandfather, so people can't hold that against him. He can't control what his grandfather did. I know a boy who's great-grandfather was a Nazi. Both he and his sister are ashamed of it. His sister was talking about how bad of a guy he was. My point is that people don't always support what their family does, and what many people's family does makes everyone in the family look bad, even if one person in the family did something. I have never heard George Bush or his father bragging about this or even talking about their relative at all. I hope you see my point.

2006-10-19 18:18:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its kind of funny

it looks like this runs in the family - bush connected to hitler bush connected to osama. Kind of makes yo thing what else they are connected to.

People here are saying so what - yet many people are condeming the Bin Ladens for the action of one member.

Is your family's action relfective of you and your actions? should we condem someone based upon actions of their relatives. I guess the logical answer is no but we justify it all the time. When 9-11 hit the osama family was flown out of the country for there protection - was it really that dangerous for them - I believe that it was other wise they would not have been taken out of the country.

We hate/blame other for mistakes that people in their race make - people from the middle east suffered because the ideas of one man.

So now just because bush has shadows in his past we can ignore them - why

I think it does not mean anything but why can we justify hating a person from the middle east or the white guy after the rodney king beating but not when its bush

2006-10-19 18:17:54 · answer #3 · answered by smartypantsmbcanada 3 · 1 0

Yes I knew it. There are many parallels between Bush and Hitler. HOWEVER,

there are serious differences too. Like:

Hitler was a soldier that served in the military in a time of war. (bush was AWOL)
Hitler was democratically elected (Bush stole 2 elections)
Hitler was not a religious fundementalist (Bush is a total fruitcake with messianic delusions)
Hitler took a broken nation and made it a world power (Bush is doing the reverse)
Hitler Killed millions (BUT, Hitler was in power for 12 years, Bush has only had 6, so give him time...)

2006-10-19 18:15:11 · answer #4 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 1 0

I know his bank funded Thiessen and his mining and coal operations during the 1930s and until 1942, Prescott Bush
was still working with the Third Riech. The have been a crime family ever since.

2006-10-19 19:34:49 · answer #5 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0 0

Yes. They laundered money for the Nazis .. and were quite well paid for doing it. IBM also supported the Nazis by making machines to keep track of how many people were going into the concentration camps. And Henry Ford gave contributions to the Hitler youth and was very supportive of the Nazi cause. Good Luck ! :)

2006-10-19 18:14:07 · answer #6 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 1 0

Oh, yes, most definitely - without papa Bush's early support Hitler would have remained a poor painter in his native Austria!

It's ALL the fault of the Bushes - NEVER FORGET THAT!!!

Queen Hillary the Great for President!

2006-10-19 18:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 2 3

no and your point is..........? What does Bush's Grandfather have to do with the way he is running our country.....I'm sorry I don't see the connection...



OH YEAH AND FOR ALL YOU "BUSH HATERS" GET OVER YOURSELF!!! I MEAN THIS IS BUSH'S LAST TERM...ITS NOT LIKE HE CAN RUN AGAIN.....


WE ARE THE LAND OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE!!!!

2006-10-19 18:14:29 · answer #8 · answered by Dani A. 2 · 0 1

Did you know Al Gore's daddy fought against the Voting Rights Act?
Hmm?
Did you?
Did you???

Cut the cr*p.

2006-10-19 18:11:40 · answer #9 · answered by northernbornsoutherner 6 · 0 1

So what I'm not gonna hold that against his desendants, no more than I would hold slavery against the desendents of the slave holders. Or the african tribal leaders that sold their own people into slavery.....Its ancient history.

2006-10-19 18:17:31 · answer #10 · answered by Honeygirl 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers