English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Don't sweat the typos. The rest of what you said is correct.

It's amazing how they hate to admit they are wrong about the economy, it is growing steadily.

2006-10-19 09:13:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

you must get your info from Fox News. Now, unlike Fox, let's be fair and balanced for a minute. And even honest. Clinton inherited a high rate of poverty. It had been in the double digits since 1981. It was 12.3% when he became President and the number of families in poverty dropped to 8.7% by the time he left office. Under the Bush Administration the poverty level increased to 9.9% in 2005 with over a million families joining the ranks of poverty under the Bush Administration.

2006-10-19 16:43:36 · answer #2 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1 0

That is a LIE!
Everyone agrees we had more money with Clinton and that Bush is shrinking the middle class. Most people before Bush who were rich are now millionaires and the middle to low middle classes are now dirt poor. I have felt these negative effects!
Do you even work for a living like the rest of us??

2006-10-19 16:16:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Only if the Bush administration changed measurement parameters.

Did you know that when the government collects information on determining employment rates they stop counting an unemployed person after a year? That person is considered to "have stopped looking for a job"? How many MILLIONS of unemployed people were/are not included in the government's figures?

2006-10-19 16:24:38 · answer #4 · answered by hungryhart 3 · 1 0

What did the middle class crew? The rich Bush family's yachts? Or are you a product of George W.'s education system and do you believe the words crew and grew to be interchangeable?

2006-10-19 16:16:06 · answer #5 · answered by Chuck N 6 · 2 0

Sorry about the figures, wonder why I went from middle class to poverty level. No bull. That is a fact.

2006-10-19 16:14:51 · answer #6 · answered by antiekmama 6 · 3 0

Liberals blame George Bush for the weak economy and say his tax cut has only made the economy worse. They point to jobs lost, the level of unemployment, the level of the financial markets and slow growth since he took office. The economy was beginning to turn around leading up to September 11, 2001. After the attack on September 11, everything changed. People did stop flying, hurting the airline industry, which in turn hurt hotels, restaurants, theme parks and tourism. There were some businesses that closed for an entire week and some in New York that never reopened. The financial markets were closed for more than a week and the financial services industry was devastated. September 11th hurt all sectors of the economy, which resulted in tens of thousands of layoffs. So how is George Bush is responsible for the poor economy? Liberals would have you forget that the attack on September 11th took place and we must never forget. George Bush is trying to revive the economy by lowering taxes. The irony here, the liberals who accuse him of hurting the economy oppose his tax cuts.

2006-10-19 16:15:52 · answer #7 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0 4

I didn't & stil don't because you give no source. I do know that the DJIA closed over 12,000 for the 1st time ever. If this happened with a Dem in the white house it would be page 1 above the fold in 3" type in every major newspaper. Have your magnifying glass ready to read it in tomorrow's papers.

2006-10-19 16:31:20 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2 1

Bush has done more for this country then the Democrats have done in the past thirty years.

Bush will be looked favorably upon in the history books, second only to Reagan.

http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=irishdictator

2006-10-21 14:21:00 · answer #9 · answered by SlapADog 4 · 0 1

OH Really? You're so cute. The middle class is joining those at poverty level as we speak!
With what silver spoon were you and Jesi fed?

2006-10-19 16:17:46 · answer #10 · answered by T S 5 · 2 1

Additional proof that Bush's "No Child Left Behind" is failing.

2006-10-19 16:16:35 · answer #11 · answered by rec 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers