The short answer is yes. They have approved pay raises for themselves time and time again as minimum wage has remained nearly stagnant. It has not even come close to keeping up with inflation. And something that is even more outrageous is the fact that many of them are millionaires to begin with!
2006-10-19 08:14:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by cannonball 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely We should readjust their pay to reflect their attention and participation, attendance.
That sen kerry had 274 (?) bills but voted only 67 (?) the rest of the time he was on the ski slopes or some junket.
As I remember the Senate score board for each bill has a "yea - ney - abstain".
I don't believe it adds to the total membership very often.
The next thing is, a dozen analysts or more have reviewed and taken the bill apart to simplify it for the legislator's (ALL) decision making.
2006-10-19 15:36:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only someone who doesn't work for congress can see it for how it is and ask a question like that.
2006-10-19 15:07:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by thezaylady 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
DATS RIGHT.
WHY WOULD ONE SPEND 10 MILLION DOLLARS OF THEIR OWN MONEY TO GET ELECT TO A JOB THAT PAYS LESS THAN 200,000 A YEAR?
ITS A PIE TRAIN-- PIE IN THE SKY DEAL.
LOBBY BRIBES -CORRUPTION-KICKBACKS-
HOW CAN ONE MAKE MEGA MILLIONS?
GET INTO POLITICS---SIN YOUR LIFE AWAY.
2006-10-19 15:08:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by cork 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
People can never fully understand wha tother people's work involves until they have to step into their shoes.
2006-10-19 15:10:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Max 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
They spend more money then they have that shouldn't be in their hands to begin with.
2006-10-19 15:12:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Both.
2006-10-19 15:22:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by dlw610 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pretty much.
2006-10-19 15:06:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋