SEEMS everyone wants it over and the troops home .The simplist way is drive 5 hous in any direction and leave . Oh yea we are surronded by the people who hate us the most on this planet .Well lets send in 800 airplanes and fly them all out one night .
Leave behind all the weapons and let the Iraqi people go at it .
2006-10-19 07:56:35 · 17 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. Lets get the hell out of there so three of my friends can come home. This war was uncalled for and the truth about 9/11 still hasn't came to life. I am not saying that the government was behind it I am merly saying we don't know enough about what happened to just start invading random muslim countries.
2006-10-19 08:06:50 · answer #1 · answered by BrownMorristown 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is ludicrous. Abandoning the people of Iraq before they are ready and able to defend their our country will allow the terrorists to win and reoccupy Iraq. They have suffered enough after decades of Hussein's rule. Just when the going gets tough... the liberals and Democrats want to take their ball and go home. I'm not winning so I won't play. Whinny sissies!
2006-10-19 15:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Republican Mom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think you qualify to speak for EVERYONE. Unlike your bug-out philosophy, I think that we must keep at it until the area is stabilized. I know that most liberals have the attention span of a common moth but they have to learn a little patience for a change and get over this give me instant gratification of I'm leaving attitude. That's the way a 4-year old acts, not a responsible citizen
2006-10-19 15:01:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, seeing how I don't want us to cut and run, and none of my associates want us to cut and run, I feel it's a pretty intelligent thing to say that not EVERYONE wants it over. It's nice to see simpletons have bought into the big liberal anti-military lie. And I really wonder if the Democrats do take control and call the troops home early if the next big attack on American soil claims the lives of you, and/or that of your family and loved ones. Because I would really hate to see another democrat fail to take action, just as Clinton failed to take action, and have that be the cause for another 3,000 or more innocents loose their lives.
2006-10-19 15:01:06 · answer #4 · answered by Cambion Chadeauwaulker 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
NO! We need to let the U.N. take this mess over, our presence their is unwanted resulting in violence and casualties increasing on a daily basis, This month has been the deadliest month in 2 years! We can't fix it when they want us out. The U.N. as a NEUTRAL entity will have much better luck by sending their own intermediary advisors...Unfortunately, that is a blow to Bush pride that would never be allowed, besides the fact that he wants his oil futures well protected by a government of HIS choosing.
2006-10-19 15:02:54 · answer #5 · answered by Katie 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You cannot be serious. Take a step back and rethink your question. Your proposal is foolish and would be the first step in the decline of the U.S. Oh wait, your a Democrat. That's your ultimate goal anyway.
2006-10-19 15:00:55 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
From the experiience of the last six years, I would say that if the Bush administration says something is black, then it most certainly must be white, and vice-versa!
2006-10-19 15:02:48 · answer #7 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pretty much the exit in Vietnam.
2006-10-19 15:00:26 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I've decided on my own using military and political knowledge.
2006-10-19 15:00:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So what you are saying is that it is okay to go to war but if it takes a long time and is tough, then we should give up? It is not that simple.
2006-10-19 15:00:28 · answer #10 · answered by Allinwiththenuts 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋