English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Not super unusual, but better than most!

2006-10-19 06:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by Molly323 5 · 0 0

Not unusual for a Toyota but it would be unheard of for a Honda...
Even though Honda makes good cars, they are notorious for including batteries that fail within the first 2 to 3 years....

2006-10-19 07:00:24 · answer #2 · answered by Andy FF1,2,CrTr,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 5 · 0 0

Wit winter coming, now may be a good idea to change the battery and change the radiator fluid (antifreeze) too. unless you have already done it. They have both paid for themselves. The battery is at it's useful life and antifreeze's corrosion inhibitors are only designed for five years.Then you are worry free for another five years. It may be time to replace the timing belt, however I am not familiar with a toyota. check owner's manual,

2006-10-19 07:02:17 · answer #3 · answered by jekin 5 · 0 0

No, it's not unusual. As long as the battery's cells are keep charging, you should be OK.

I just changed the battery in one of my cars after 95K+ miles over 7 years.

2006-10-19 06:50:55 · answer #4 · answered by errant_hero 4 · 1 0

Yes...but not for a Toyota--they're awesome!!! I just got one for that very reason, I needed something that was totally reliable and Toyota has an outstanding reputation for that. : )

2006-10-19 06:49:30 · answer #5 · answered by ANGEL 5 · 2 0

Not too unusual, but if you dont want to be stranded soon, I would go ahead and replace it.

2006-10-19 06:55:39 · answer #6 · answered by juniper 3 · 1 0

Oh yeah,but it's going to be due to be changed soon.

2006-10-19 06:54:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

knock on wood dude

2006-10-19 06:56:04 · answer #8 · answered by beachnut222000 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers