2006-10-19 06:03:16 · 28 answers · asked by Saucy B 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Regular legover.
2006-10-22 06:59:09 · answer #1 · answered by roobies mam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saw this on another answer section and thought it hilarious!!
It's a very sad world we live in when Sir Paul McCartney and his wife are facing divorce and all anyone seems to want to do is make jokes about her false leg
Personally, I think it's prosthetic.
News reports have confirmed that Paul McCartney has separated from his wife Heather Mills-McCartney.
Mrs Mills-McCartney is said to be distraught over the split. "He has been my crutch for so long"! She said in an earlier briefing, "I have no idea why this has happened, I'm stumped"
-------------
"She's running around in circles", according to a close friend, "she will need all the support she can get. It's not like its easy to walk out on a relationship like this"
-------------
It is not known whether a pre-nuptial agreement was signed prior to the marriage. Paul McCartney is one of the richest men in the world amassing a colossal wealth due to his participation with The Beatles and subsequent musical collaborations, if an agreement hasn't been signed it is believed that she won't have a leg to stand on.
-------------
Rumours abound over the split which have suggested that infidelity May have been the cause. "She's terrible" a source stated, "always trying to get her leg over".
-------------
Another source has suggested that her battle with alcoholism was the cause. "Macca couldn't handle it anymore" a friend said, "he would get home at night and find her legless"
-------------
Many have attributed this to a problem which started with the present that Paul bought her prior to the wedding. He gave her a new prosthetic leg for Christmas but that was just a stocking-filler. The main gift was a plane but then he gave her a Lady-Shave for the other leg.
Additional Details
3 days ago
These jokes are funny but lets spare a thought for Paul please. Now she has left him, he's going to struggle to find another lady that can fill her shoe.
2006-10-19 07:00:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ali 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's very nearly boasted of having been completely ignorant about his song, so unlike different divorcees who those days received enormous payouts after lengthy marriages, she will be ready to't declare to have made any contribution to his fortune. i desire she receives as low as conceivable, yet in an age the position Rebecca bogs can make a occupation out of having had an affair with a footballer, certainly the ex-spouse of a Beatle can seem ahead to a lengthy and rewarding occupation as a 'movie star'.
2016-12-05 00:16:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows what went on between them - we certainly don't and will probably never find out the complete truth. But, I think he married too quickly after Linda died. I think it was more of a rebound situation for a man who hadn't been on his own for over 30 years and felt like he didn't want to be before he even knew what he really wanted. Whether Heather is the praying mantis in this situation or just as much a victim I don't know but you could tell it was a complete mis-match from the start.
2006-10-19 06:11:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He did but still went ahead and married 'that woman' every time i see her I want to punch her lights out.....Linda must be crying for him in heaven!! hope Linda haunts 'her'.Love certainly was blind in this case!!
I agree with everyone about the money...why should she have what Macca made years before she appeared on the scene..! It makes so many people angry ..i am disabled but i get on with life and not use it to my advantage....As long as the poor child is catered for and well looked after that's where the money should go....GOLD DIGGER..TRY GETTING A JOB!
2006-10-20 18:39:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly let me state - I know I'm a total stranger and have no idea who these people REALLY ARE - but we have all met these type of woman "oh, I've been treated so badly by all the men in my life all my life.... its destroyed me.... look at me... whoa is me.... poor little me.... - she is a disgrace to all the inspiring disabled people around the world today - how dare she bring such tittle tatt to the UK courts. These are such silly little arguments which certainly don't warrant her more than the £30 Million already generously agreed with Paul McCartney.
2006-10-20 09:15:25 · answer #6 · answered by Nikita 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sir Paul was being interviewed days after it had been announced that his marriage had ended.
The interviewer asked "Sir Paul, do you think you will go down on one knee again?"
Sir Paul answered "No, and I would prefer it if you called her Heather".
Basically, he was a sad lonely man having lost his wife, she was a woman who had her eye on the big prize. One wedding, one baby and now more money than most people could even imagine having! Who's the fool?
2006-10-20 05:08:13 · answer #7 · answered by cobster 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was probably flattered that someone younger than him actually thought he was attractive....even though she was in it for the money, I mean who wouldn't be...it's not as if he's goodlooking or anything.
Feel sorry for him though at he same time, it's bad enough being humiliated but to have it all over the news all over the world is a bit unfair.
2006-10-19 06:15:49 · answer #8 · answered by debs1701 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that he married on the rebound...but everyone knew she was only after money...losing a leg don't give her carte blanc to be a B***h.
Being fair the most she should get is half of what he earned since they married...after all a huge proportion of his wealth was there before her.
2006-10-19 08:59:20 · answer #9 · answered by saffron1951 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
love is a big red ended thing, interview with sir paul; sir paul after all thats gone on in your present marraige, do you think you will ever go down on one leg again ; " i would like you to keep heather out of this, thank you"
2006-10-19 07:00:28 · answer #10 · answered by kevannwaller 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋