This is for my debate class. I need help on what are some good reasons that it is a good idea to pass "surveillance" by the government. I just debated the negative side. Now I need some help with the opposite side. Please give me some good philosophers, values, contentions, and anything else! Thanks!
2006-10-19 05:50:36 · 5 answers · asked by picklerunderwoodfan 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I would look to George W. communications for that. There is more government surveilance now than anytime I have ever seen.
I'll help you with some of the reasons our government has given us for the recent changes to our freedoms: child safety, to track and identify international terrorist cells, homeland security, to track and indentify internet predators (financial, pedophiles), to identify crazies within our own community with bad intent I.E. Columbine, postal guy, etc.
Look up the patriot act and the justifications for renewing it. Good luck with your debate!
2006-10-19 06:49:49 · answer #1 · answered by BParker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! What a debate!
To make your arguments better, make sure to talk about the timeline for when and conditions under which the "surveillance" would be allowed.
Conditions: In wartime, for convicted felons,
Timeline: during the war and a year after, for three years after release or during probationary period
2006-10-19 05:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by J G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Japan had already mentioned that there could be "no give up". They like Winston Churchill had been inclined to combat at the seashores............. While you're declaring the damage that America did to these deficient Japanese, What approximately the guys ladies and sure youngsters that they slaughtered of their hundreds and hundreds. Their list isn't squeaky blank and the governing frame on the time had been under no circumstances going to give up. I in my opinion suppose that every one struggle is flawed. Killing someone climate you understand them to be blameless or now not is flawed, what's worse are individuals who don't get their details instantly. You ought to study in multiple position to reach at a good balances announcement. As for racism, that so far as I'm involved flawed on all sides. I have had my reasonable percentage of racism from Muslims. I have even been requested to not whinge approximately it via the civil carrier that I used to paintings for. I have had extra racism off Muslims greater than you might potentially recognise. I am in poor health of it honestly and the Muslim global calling western ladies White Whores, how racists is that!! I am now not a racist and I do not care wherein you come back from or what you appear like. Please bear in mind that their is flawed on all sides right here. There isn't any excuse for racism or struggle and not anything well ever got here from both. But I am in poor health and worn out of folks pronouncing "Whites this and Christians that, black this and black that, complain, complain. whiny, whiny". I do not pay attention to any preacher or baby-kisser who says racist matters. If all of us stopped giving them a reaction they could all quit.
2016-08-31 23:28:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some good reasons for goverment survelliance its as a tatical weapon against terroism, that is about the only good thing I see because the goverment already has enough say in our daily lives anyway I know your delima however and I hope you get another supporting reason
2006-10-19 05:57:13 · answer #4 · answered by jkfranklin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a good thing because IT WILL KEEP YOU ALIVE! Period.
2006-10-19 06:01:07 · answer #5 · answered by Lily P 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋