Rep. Ray LaHood (news, bio, voting record), R-Ill., some members have indicated that they would terminate the page service after almost 200 years of tradition. As LaHood explained, "We should not subject young men and women to this kind of activity, this kind of vulnerability." When asked whether he was suggesting that his colleagues cannot be trusted with children, he responded, "Well, that's pretty obvious."
2006-10-19 05:41:36 · 8 answers · asked by Where's the beef? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think instead his colleagues should all be banned.
2006-10-19 05:46:10 · answer #1 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Thats probabbly not a bad Idea, at least it's a start! After that I would like to end the lobbyists but then where would the money that all poloticians line there pockets with from special interests come from?
2006-10-19 12:46:30 · answer #2 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should ban lobbyists...isnt that almost 200 years of tradition also? Change is good.
2006-10-19 12:46:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was okay for years when Democrats had sex with little pages.
It was great for Democrats to have sex with interns.
Now, all of the sudden it may be bad.
(I'll bet it's still okay to have sex with kids, if it is a Democrat doing it.)
2006-10-19 12:47:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Conflating pages and lobbyists - is there NOTHING that your weak little mind cannot connect?
2006-10-19 12:44:44 · answer #5 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, they should ban themselves too.
2006-10-19 12:57:37 · answer #6 · answered by Balaam's Talking Donkey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i say we add more pages, then they can unionize , and get better pay for having sex with thier bosses!
2006-10-19 12:50:27 · answer #7 · answered by the howdy poke 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i bought from them before.
http://www.raybanchina.net/
2014-08-02 05:13:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋