English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does this mean smoking is allowed when children are not in the 'environment' ?

2006-10-19 05:07:08 · 10 answers · asked by JRS 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

10 answers

I have a friend that this was the stipulation in his getting custody of his children. They can't smoke in the house nor in the car while his daughter is with him.

2006-10-19 05:10:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would say probably not since the smoke lingers onto everything, curtains, furniture, the car furniture. Everything should be smoke free almost 100% of the time.

Restaurants cannot be considered "smoke free" unless smoking is never allowed.

Good luck, sounds like the best reason I've ever heard to give up the habit, if not for yourself, then for your children.

2006-10-19 05:22:04 · answer #2 · answered by Heather S 4 · 0 0

I don't think this is an odd statement/request at all. I also would think that smoking would not be allowed in the home or vehicle where children will be. My 3 children all have allergies that are exacerbated by smoke...my soon-to-be-ex's mother smokes, and my pediatrician has advised me that not only should my kids not be in her home or vehicle, but even getting up against her (hugging her or sitting on her lap) could trigger an asthma attack because the smoke (nicotine) clings to everything...hair, clothes, fingers, skin...etc...

Not trying to be confrontational, but we all know smoking is not only bad for the person who smokes, but also for everyone around them. Be a great parent - don't give your ex anything to complain in that department and give up the smoking for your sake and that of you kids. You'll be around longer for them. Good luck!

2006-10-19 05:17:27 · answer #3 · answered by in love love love... 2 · 1 0

T right this is not any Federal regulation that immediately entitles a former companion to an element of a member’s militia retired pay. A former companion might desire to have been provided an element of a member’s militia retired pay in a State courtroom order. The Uniformed ServicesFormer Spouses’ protection Act (USFSPA), call 10, u . s . Code, section 1408, handed in 1981, accomplishestwo issues. First, itauthorizes(yet doesnot require)State courts to divide militia retired pay as a marital asset or as community belongings in a divorce proceeding. 2nd, it components a mechanism for a former companion to enforce a retired pay as belongings award by way of direct money from the member’s retired pay. Retired pay as belongings money are potential basically. Retired pay arrears can't be amassed below the USFSPA.

2016-11-23 19:29:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Smoke still stays in the air, and the stink fills the house and gets into furniture and clothes - why not just quit smoking all together, and do everyone a favor? I grew up with a heavy smoker, and I'm paying the price for his addiction - this is not fair.

2006-10-19 05:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by woodlands127 5 · 1 0

The kids shouldn't have to live in a house that is full of smoke. So I guess you have to smoke outside. Isn't divorce great?

2006-10-19 05:10:34 · answer #6 · answered by sheeny 6 · 0 0

Yes, that is what is means. I smoke so I can say this, you should not smoke if you have kids. It is time to quit.

2006-10-19 05:10:16 · answer #7 · answered by Bill 3 · 0 0

Are you asking if the judge has ordered the other parent NOT to smoke? Fat chance, but I suppose anything is possible.

2006-10-19 05:10:34 · answer #8 · answered by Valerie 6 · 0 0

it means that it is smoke free no matter what.

2006-10-19 05:10:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

one can only assume that, but you should ask for clarification, that is such an odd request..

2006-10-19 05:09:07 · answer #10 · answered by sweet 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers