India . Laggi bet.
2006-10-19 21:19:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bluffmaster 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Australia
2006-10-19 23:47:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ponting (24no) might want to snap his lean run this sequence and convey a gem, with the help of Mike Hussey (5no), if Australia are any probability of giving the large purpose a shake. in difficulty-free words 3 aspects in one hundred thirty years of try cricket have ever received chasing over 400, yet no area has pulled off the feat on Australian soil. Bradman's 1948 team revealed 3-404 to conquer England in Leeds, at the same time as Steve Waugh's adult males reached 6-369 to conquer Pakistan in Hobart in 1999. yet this eco-friendly Australian area might want to exceed both those efforts to achieve the 2d-maximum valuable chase, at the back of in difficulty-free words the West Indies' 7-418 adversarial to Waugh's team in St John's in 2003. pondering about data , it will be INDIA .......
2016-12-05 00:12:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by gerrit 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If one is not living in a fool's dream land and have got a slight bit of sanity left in him, then defintely Australia.
2006-10-19 11:34:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by cricfever 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course india ...friggin y does sm ppl thinkz if they can beat sril anka they can beat any1 ... ewwww austarila isnt evn gud anymo
INDIA IS SO GUNNA WIN
i agree wif this $$get money$$
2006-10-19 15:16:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by punjabiking200 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
australia
2006-10-19 19:28:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
india of course! anyone who thinks aussies will win is surely madddddddd!.
2006-10-19 06:32:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by skywalker 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
INDIANS WILL NEVER LOSE HOPW AND THUS INDIA WILL WIN!!
HOOO HAAA INDIA AAYA INDIA!!
2006-10-19 21:32:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by aki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
`India. Why? Why not.
2006-10-19 04:55:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll give you a few reasons!
Tendulkar
Dravid
Yuvraj
Kaif
etc........and so on, and on!.
2006-10-19 14:35:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by $GET SOME$ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋