English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-19 02:31:35 · 5 answers · asked by bassam 1 in Social Science Economics

5 answers

90% are on between 10th & 1000th of world average pay/hour - ie, between US$7500 & US$75 /family /year

99% are on less than world average pay/hour

1% are paid from 1x to million times world average pay/hour

1% get 90% of world income - US$70 trillion /year, or US$70,000 /year /family [1 billion families] - 1% earn less than 1% of world income [because the poor have to work, the rich dont] - ie, 1% are stealing 89% of world income - US$70 trillion /year - & nobody knows & nobody cares - although it is creating all the violence [war & crime] which is escalating to extinction soon [we already have 60x the bombs to extinguish all life]

world average pay is US$75,000 /family /year

ie, 1000s of years of richgetricher poorgetpoorer have hoovered up most of world income, leaving 90% in major poverty - less than US$7500 /family /year

225 ppl have as much as 2,500,000,000 [2.5 billion] ppl

ie, superextreme theft, evil, murder, hatred, anger, violence

& the world is content

with justice [equal pay for equal work] every family working average hard would be getting US$75,000 /year - plenty - ie, everyone is earning plenty - which they earn by their work - but 1% take 90-99.9% off 90% & another 0-90% off another 9% - the greatest robbery never told, never grasped, never realised, never feared, never on the news, never discussed by any of the most esteemed minds of the world - the violence generated never feared

how much violence would be generated if you were lowered to 10th of yr income for the same workhours? - quite a bit - multiply by 5 billion - that is how much violence [destruction waste cost suffering] would be destroyed by stopping the giant robbery - but you cant get humans to do so - not even from selfinterest - it would obvously be enormously beneficial to all, for there to be so much less violence, plus less overpower among the superoverpaid [tyranny, corruption] plus less poverty [disease, ignorance, waste of 90% of human brains]

it is like a swimming pool & an earthquake throws the water up a million times the depth of the pool - obviously not much water left in the pool, & nobody can swim

very sad, very bad, very mad

click on nigelbestpeace & see my other answers for more information & a plan to save humanity from its selfmade vast misery & its no-future

1 billion are on less than $1/day [$365/year]
3 billion are on less than $2/day [$730/year]
5 billion are on less than $20/day [$7300/yr]

everyone grabbing for all the cake & destroying peace & plenty, when there is enough for plenty for all

2006-10-20 17:56:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The least poor countries in the world are in Africa,followed by Asian and Carribean Countries.Mozambique and Burundi are leading.But why are poor?You need to address this first

2006-10-19 02:43:19 · answer #2 · answered by Piemu Esquire Team 2 · 0 0

It's sort of reverse phycology economics..... (and not exactly correct)
but something like 98% of the worlds wealth is shared by 2% of the population.

2006-10-19 03:30:23 · answer #3 · answered by Mark 1 · 0 1

No.
Learn how to say "please."
That would not change my "answer" to your demand - it's still NO.

2006-10-19 02:40:08 · answer #4 · answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7 · 0 0

no

2006-10-19 02:34:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers